![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 November 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I am the VP Social Media for Vision Critical, and have just submitted a set of proposed changes (and placed them in the review queue) in order to bring this article up-to-date. These changes are all fact-based and reference external sources. I have conferred with the Wikipedia team and have tried to conform to the principles around conflict-of-interest and transparency; our intent is just to ensure the article is current and factually accurate. awsamuel ( talk) 21:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
I don't understand what is wrong with my post. I feel it is important for any large organization to have a page on Wikipedia as it is the main source the public uses to find out about topics such as market research. A company under our umbrella, Angus Reid Public Opinion, has a Wikipedia page that is not a problem - I can also show you many other pages that are similar. Therefore I think we should be allowed to keep this listing. Please explain why you disagree or how the page is in any way biased or sales oriented. I have written it in an entirely factual and referenced manner.
Kirstinhepburn ( talk) 00:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Here is an example of a similar, albeit much smaller, company that has a page on Wikipedia. These pages are almost identical in their content. Please help me understand why you have flagged my entry.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_Entertainment
Kirstinhepburn ( talk) 00:53, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Kirstinhepburn ( talk) 22:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
I have updated the article with links to several "reliable third-party references" that demonstrate that somebody else (BC Business, Globe & Mail, Research Magazine, Vancouver Sun, etc) thinks Vision Critical and Dr Angus Reid are important enough to be included in Wikipedia. I hope this will help.
http://www.bcbusinessonline.ca/bcb/tech-innovation/2010/04/02/vision-critical
http://www.bcbusinessonline.ca/bcb/top-stories/2010/05/05/angus-reid-line
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/your-business/business-categories/web-strategy/should-you-go-big-with-your-blog/article1765866/
http://iaindale.blogspot.com/2009/12/speech-slogan-pollster-of-year.html
http://www.research-live.com/features/how-the-recession-is-reshaping-research/4001520.article
Kirstinhepburn (
talk)
21:53, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 November 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I am the VP Social Media for Vision Critical, and have just submitted a set of proposed changes (and placed them in the review queue) in order to bring this article up-to-date. These changes are all fact-based and reference external sources. I have conferred with the Wikipedia team and have tried to conform to the principles around conflict-of-interest and transparency; our intent is just to ensure the article is current and factually accurate. awsamuel ( talk) 21:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
I don't understand what is wrong with my post. I feel it is important for any large organization to have a page on Wikipedia as it is the main source the public uses to find out about topics such as market research. A company under our umbrella, Angus Reid Public Opinion, has a Wikipedia page that is not a problem - I can also show you many other pages that are similar. Therefore I think we should be allowed to keep this listing. Please explain why you disagree or how the page is in any way biased or sales oriented. I have written it in an entirely factual and referenced manner.
Kirstinhepburn ( talk) 00:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Here is an example of a similar, albeit much smaller, company that has a page on Wikipedia. These pages are almost identical in their content. Please help me understand why you have flagged my entry.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_Entertainment
Kirstinhepburn ( talk) 00:53, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Kirstinhepburn ( talk) 22:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
I have updated the article with links to several "reliable third-party references" that demonstrate that somebody else (BC Business, Globe & Mail, Research Magazine, Vancouver Sun, etc) thinks Vision Critical and Dr Angus Reid are important enough to be included in Wikipedia. I hope this will help.
http://www.bcbusinessonline.ca/bcb/tech-innovation/2010/04/02/vision-critical
http://www.bcbusinessonline.ca/bcb/top-stories/2010/05/05/angus-reid-line
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/your-business/business-categories/web-strategy/should-you-go-big-with-your-blog/article1765866/
http://iaindale.blogspot.com/2009/12/speech-slogan-pollster-of-year.html
http://www.research-live.com/features/how-the-recession-is-reshaping-research/4001520.article
Kirstinhepburn (
talk)
21:53, 26 November 2010 (UTC)