A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 10, 2017. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Systemic Constellations, which has been linked to Virigina Satir's work, is not the same thing as Family Reconstructions. Family Reconstructions are carefully planned and constructed events for a particular person, called the "star," that happen on a prearranged day and look over the person's life in a kind of timeline. The faciliator may have fathered props, interviewed people and otherwise produces the event. It is much more based on role play, like psychodrama, than the phenomenological process.
I think the text above sound blur:
"[...]However Virginia herself was known to be rather uneasy about the distillation of her work[...]"
Should not it be "dissemination of her work" instead of "distillation of her work"? See Merriam-Webster's entry: [ [1]]
-- Volphy 20:31, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
I believe it should be distillation. Jerry Weinberg's quote which supports this is that he wanted the chicken (Virginia Satir) and not the chicken soup (NLP).
-- Ambitus 20:34, 19 October 2006 (BST)
Is it standard to refer to people by their first or last name alone after giving their full name at first? She is referred to as Virginia in the second para, then Virginia Satir in the third - should it just be Satir? Guidelines say to be bold - so I'm changing it. ;o)
I don't know what the Wikipedia standard is, but I read somewhere that Virginia Satir disliked being referred to as Satir.
-- Ambitus 11:25, 23 October 2006 (BST)
External links on Wikipedia are supposed to be "encyclopedic in nature" and useful to a worldwide audience. Please read the external links policy before adding more external links.
The following kinds of links are inappropriate:
I realize that some links are helpful to certain users, but they still do not comply with Wikipedia policy, and therefore must not be included in the article. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 07:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Virginia Satir. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 02:04, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Virginia Satir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:08, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 10, 2017. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Systemic Constellations, which has been linked to Virigina Satir's work, is not the same thing as Family Reconstructions. Family Reconstructions are carefully planned and constructed events for a particular person, called the "star," that happen on a prearranged day and look over the person's life in a kind of timeline. The faciliator may have fathered props, interviewed people and otherwise produces the event. It is much more based on role play, like psychodrama, than the phenomenological process.
I think the text above sound blur:
"[...]However Virginia herself was known to be rather uneasy about the distillation of her work[...]"
Should not it be "dissemination of her work" instead of "distillation of her work"? See Merriam-Webster's entry: [ [1]]
-- Volphy 20:31, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
I believe it should be distillation. Jerry Weinberg's quote which supports this is that he wanted the chicken (Virginia Satir) and not the chicken soup (NLP).
-- Ambitus 20:34, 19 October 2006 (BST)
Is it standard to refer to people by their first or last name alone after giving their full name at first? She is referred to as Virginia in the second para, then Virginia Satir in the third - should it just be Satir? Guidelines say to be bold - so I'm changing it. ;o)
I don't know what the Wikipedia standard is, but I read somewhere that Virginia Satir disliked being referred to as Satir.
-- Ambitus 11:25, 23 October 2006 (BST)
External links on Wikipedia are supposed to be "encyclopedic in nature" and useful to a worldwide audience. Please read the external links policy before adding more external links.
The following kinds of links are inappropriate:
I realize that some links are helpful to certain users, but they still do not comply with Wikipedia policy, and therefore must not be included in the article. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 07:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Virginia Satir. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 02:04, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Virginia Satir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:08, 6 December 2017 (UTC)