![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A link to this article was posted on r/mensrights just over an hour ago and a few minutes ago the article was vandalised
I think it's worth noting that this is just following another incident of vandalism by the community yesterday.
If further edits are made against the article, I will request semi-protection -- Drowninginlimbo ( talk) 18:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Give canvassing a read. However it is alright, it must be done in a certain manner as to not disrupt discussions and influence Consensus one way or another.
I'm deleting the Feminist section, because honestly, we don't need to be promoting this sort of bullshit from random academics anyway. WP:NPOV, WP:Notability, etc. Maybe copy-paste it to Feminist Geography ( /info/en/?search=Feminist_geography) if we have to keep it. 124.170.111.132 ( talk) 05:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
I stumbled across this article and was surprised to see the very odd and seemingly misplaced prose about views of sexuality and feminism in an article about architecture. I can understand why certain editors have voiced their dismay about it being there. I have re-written the entire paragraph to avoid the following issues:
1) Loos was an architect, not an interior designer, so the part about him placing sofas here and there is not convincing. The home owner (or their interior designer) would do that after moving in.
2) The part about "psychologically ..." needs to be removed because no psychologist has rendered an opinion on the appearance of the house; and Colomina is not a psychologist either.
3) The part about "speculation" is not good either; readers needs facts, not speculation.
4) The “voyeur concept” seems farfetched even to a rank layman with no architectural experience whatsoever.
5) And, finally, I have retitled the header for the paragraph to read “Colomina: Space and sexuality” which is what nearly the entire paragraph is about—her interpretations of the sexual nature of the spaces in the home.
I have taken the liberty to remove the tag mentioning the controversy regarding this paragraph. Hopefully this edit will suffice to quell any animosities still felt between the various editors in disagreement. -- Wapiti ( talk) 23:28, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Villa Müller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A link to this article was posted on r/mensrights just over an hour ago and a few minutes ago the article was vandalised
I think it's worth noting that this is just following another incident of vandalism by the community yesterday.
If further edits are made against the article, I will request semi-protection -- Drowninginlimbo ( talk) 18:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Give canvassing a read. However it is alright, it must be done in a certain manner as to not disrupt discussions and influence Consensus one way or another.
I'm deleting the Feminist section, because honestly, we don't need to be promoting this sort of bullshit from random academics anyway. WP:NPOV, WP:Notability, etc. Maybe copy-paste it to Feminist Geography ( /info/en/?search=Feminist_geography) if we have to keep it. 124.170.111.132 ( talk) 05:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
I stumbled across this article and was surprised to see the very odd and seemingly misplaced prose about views of sexuality and feminism in an article about architecture. I can understand why certain editors have voiced their dismay about it being there. I have re-written the entire paragraph to avoid the following issues:
1) Loos was an architect, not an interior designer, so the part about him placing sofas here and there is not convincing. The home owner (or their interior designer) would do that after moving in.
2) The part about "psychologically ..." needs to be removed because no psychologist has rendered an opinion on the appearance of the house; and Colomina is not a psychologist either.
3) The part about "speculation" is not good either; readers needs facts, not speculation.
4) The “voyeur concept” seems farfetched even to a rank layman with no architectural experience whatsoever.
5) And, finally, I have retitled the header for the paragraph to read “Colomina: Space and sexuality” which is what nearly the entire paragraph is about—her interpretations of the sexual nature of the spaces in the home.
I have taken the liberty to remove the tag mentioning the controversy regarding this paragraph. Hopefully this edit will suffice to quell any animosities still felt between the various editors in disagreement. -- Wapiti ( talk) 23:28, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Villa Müller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)