Vilayet Printing House (Sarajevo) has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 31, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Vilayet Printing House (Sarajevo) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 2 June 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 14:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
I will take this one. Sainsf <^> Feel at home 14:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
No copyvio detected, sources fine, the text is very well written and the images suffice. That should be all. Good luck! Sainsf <^> Feel at home 17:35, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Update: A bit busy now, I think I will be able to get to this only by the end of this week. Cheers! Sainsf <^> Feel at home 18:43, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
@ Sainsf: No prob, just notify me when you're ready. 23 editor ( talk) 01:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
@ 23 editor: Read the article once again. The prose is very well-written, and I have no more comments. Please ping me when you are done with the points above; these done, I would be happy to pass the article. Sainsf <^> Feel at home 09:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
@ Sainsf: I already dealt with all the points you brought up. 23 editor ( talk) 12:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Vilayet Printing House (Sarajevo) has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 31, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Vilayet Printing House (Sarajevo) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 2 June 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 14:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
I will take this one. Sainsf <^> Feel at home 14:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
No copyvio detected, sources fine, the text is very well written and the images suffice. That should be all. Good luck! Sainsf <^> Feel at home 17:35, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Update: A bit busy now, I think I will be able to get to this only by the end of this week. Cheers! Sainsf <^> Feel at home 18:43, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
@ Sainsf: No prob, just notify me when you're ready. 23 editor ( talk) 01:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
@ 23 editor: Read the article once again. The prose is very well-written, and I have no more comments. Please ping me when you are done with the points above; these done, I would be happy to pass the article. Sainsf <^> Feel at home 09:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
@ Sainsf: I already dealt with all the points you brought up. 23 editor ( talk) 12:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)