![]() | VESA Stereo was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 November 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Video Electronics Standards Association. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Video Electronics Standards Association article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
some of the links listed in reference are to subscribers only.
mainly : Commentary: Will VESA survive DisplayPort? recomend removing, or providing diffrent sources. till that time i cant be sure wiki is that great source to learn about vesa, aswell alot of it is verry lean, this article could use some love as it hasnt been touched in years
sources be
Add DisplayPort to the list of VESA standards? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frap ( talk • contribs) 17:08, 14 December 2005
I'm not a fan of how this is phrased.
VESA had been criticized for holding miserable track record when it comes to digital interface standards.[2]
- 216.138.38.86 20:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
所謂的視訊電子標準協會Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) 乃是一個國際性的團體, 成立於1980年代的後期由 NEC Home Electronics以及八個視訊顯示器adaptor製造商所聯合發起的. 起初的目標為制定一個標準提供給解析度為 800x600 SVGA 的視訊顯示器使用. Andypongtw ( talk) 17:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
IMO it's noteworthy enough to warrant its own article, as a very large number of monitors (especially LCDs) use CVT-based custom resolutions. 24.106.24.122 ( talk) 20:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
There's useless information here about pronounciation.
Which is the misconception -
Or,
-- 76.254.85.70 ( talk) 19:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
The guideline on pronounciation makes no sense at all. As the user above mentions, it is not clear what the author is trying to say about how the word should be pronounced. Therefore I have removed it.
86.179.67.33 (
talk)
16:08, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
The entire criticisms section is hard to understand because of the grammar. The sentence "VESA has the practice of heavily charging published standard", I am afraid to try to fix because I am not sure of the intended meaning. (Did they mean frequently changing? Did they mean charging a lot of money?) 76.233.145.185 ( talk) 10:24, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Someone, IP 93.103.44.244, added a NPOV tag to the "criticisms" section without starting a discussion on the issue even though the NPOV tag explicitly says go see the discussion on the talk page. I have re-worded the section to be a bit more neutral, but it could still use some work. Makyen ( talk) 13:15, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 00:00, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() | VESA Stereo was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 November 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Video Electronics Standards Association. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Video Electronics Standards Association article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
some of the links listed in reference are to subscribers only.
mainly : Commentary: Will VESA survive DisplayPort? recomend removing, or providing diffrent sources. till that time i cant be sure wiki is that great source to learn about vesa, aswell alot of it is verry lean, this article could use some love as it hasnt been touched in years
sources be
Add DisplayPort to the list of VESA standards? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frap ( talk • contribs) 17:08, 14 December 2005
I'm not a fan of how this is phrased.
VESA had been criticized for holding miserable track record when it comes to digital interface standards.[2]
- 216.138.38.86 20:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
所謂的視訊電子標準協會Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) 乃是一個國際性的團體, 成立於1980年代的後期由 NEC Home Electronics以及八個視訊顯示器adaptor製造商所聯合發起的. 起初的目標為制定一個標準提供給解析度為 800x600 SVGA 的視訊顯示器使用. Andypongtw ( talk) 17:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
IMO it's noteworthy enough to warrant its own article, as a very large number of monitors (especially LCDs) use CVT-based custom resolutions. 24.106.24.122 ( talk) 20:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
There's useless information here about pronounciation.
Which is the misconception -
Or,
-- 76.254.85.70 ( talk) 19:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
The guideline on pronounciation makes no sense at all. As the user above mentions, it is not clear what the author is trying to say about how the word should be pronounced. Therefore I have removed it.
86.179.67.33 (
talk)
16:08, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
The entire criticisms section is hard to understand because of the grammar. The sentence "VESA has the practice of heavily charging published standard", I am afraid to try to fix because I am not sure of the intended meaning. (Did they mean frequently changing? Did they mean charging a lot of money?) 76.233.145.185 ( talk) 10:24, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Someone, IP 93.103.44.244, added a NPOV tag to the "criticisms" section without starting a discussion on the issue even though the NPOV tag explicitly says go see the discussion on the talk page. I have re-worded the section to be a bit more neutral, but it could still use some work. Makyen ( talk) 13:15, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 00:00, 30 June 2013 (UTC)