 | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2014. The result of the discussion was Delete and redirect to NCH Software. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Proper spelling of this software is VideoPad, not Videopad. Everything on Videopad page should be recreated on a VideoPad page with a redirector from "Videopad". N3362 ( talk) 17:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done, thanks. Check out Wikipedia:Moving a page to learn how to accomplish this yourself in future. Regards, Skomorokh 17:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
This page needs some pictures! TechGenius ( talk) 18:52, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Crapware! Re-associates a lot of filetypes, then trying to download tons of "install-on-demand" shareware software (audio editor, ISO burner, some codecs, player etc.) 109.95.41.11 ( talk) 14:59, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Is this actually trialware? The website states that there is a free version and a pro version. The free version outputs both webm and ogv (not mentioned in this article) making it a choice to edit videos for commons. But the free version is limited to home/non commercial use. Commons is commercial? -- 95.90.184.172 ( talk) 02:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Apparently, the NCH website has been falsely claiming for years now that the home edition of VideoPad was "free", but after using it for a while they disable, among other things, the video export rendering the SW useless unless you purchase a licence (ca. 40 USD as of today). Clearly, they are deliberately misleading potential users about their licence model, then slap them with a fee. Which also appears to be very successful in luring superficial reviewers from lazy tech websites to repeat their false claim that VideoPad Home was "free". IMHO it is a pity that NCH lowers themselves to such dishonesty, because I found the software to work really well, and to be on par with other editors in that price range. If they had been upfront honest about their SW being trialware, I would probably have been willing to pay for it, but I don't believe in rewarding companies for lying to me. -- Theoprakt ( talk) 16:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi all, I'm an employee of the organization that created this product and I know the recent software release has removed the burning of "blu-rays" discs and hence would like to remove that mention under the "Features" section. This can be further verified by installing the latest version. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Softwarebuild ( talk • contribs) 07:16, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
| The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2014. The result of the discussion was Delete and redirect to NCH Software. |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Proper spelling of this software is VideoPad, not Videopad. Everything on Videopad page should be recreated on a VideoPad page with a redirector from "Videopad". N3362 ( talk) 17:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done, thanks. Check out Wikipedia:Moving a page to learn how to accomplish this yourself in future. Regards, Skomorokh 17:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
This page needs some pictures! TechGenius ( talk) 18:52, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Crapware! Re-associates a lot of filetypes, then trying to download tons of "install-on-demand" shareware software (audio editor, ISO burner, some codecs, player etc.) 109.95.41.11 ( talk) 14:59, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Is this actually trialware? The website states that there is a free version and a pro version. The free version outputs both webm and ogv (not mentioned in this article) making it a choice to edit videos for commons. But the free version is limited to home/non commercial use. Commons is commercial? -- 95.90.184.172 ( talk) 02:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Apparently, the NCH website has been falsely claiming for years now that the home edition of VideoPad was "free", but after using it for a while they disable, among other things, the video export rendering the SW useless unless you purchase a licence (ca. 40 USD as of today). Clearly, they are deliberately misleading potential users about their licence model, then slap them with a fee. Which also appears to be very successful in luring superficial reviewers from lazy tech websites to repeat their false claim that VideoPad Home was "free". IMHO it is a pity that NCH lowers themselves to such dishonesty, because I found the software to work really well, and to be on par with other editors in that price range. If they had been upfront honest about their SW being trialware, I would probably have been willing to pay for it, but I don't believe in rewarding companies for lying to me. -- Theoprakt ( talk) 16:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi all, I'm an employee of the organization that created this product and I know the recent software release has removed the burning of "blu-rays" discs and hence would like to remove that mention under the "Features" section. This can be further verified by installing the latest version. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Softwarebuild ( talk • contribs) 07:16, 7 July 2021 (UTC)