From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

“Disseminating information”

I get that the hoax accusations are probably a government reaction (could also be true, but prpbably bit of both), but is there a better way of wording it? She’s not an official spokesperson of OPM either, but “disseminating information” has a weird tone to it. Juxlos ( talk) 02:54, 19 September 2021 (UTC) reply

"One-sided information"

I reverted these edits on the basis of violating WP:NPOV. I doubt that sources prominently describe this person as being widely known for being one-sided, and I likewise doubt that our article should describe her that way. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 05:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The editor of the aforementioned edits is basically a single-purpose account. Judging from the level of grammar and wording, not exactly a good faith editor IMO. Juxlos ( talk) 05:19, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

“Disseminating information”

I get that the hoax accusations are probably a government reaction (could also be true, but prpbably bit of both), but is there a better way of wording it? She’s not an official spokesperson of OPM either, but “disseminating information” has a weird tone to it. Juxlos ( talk) 02:54, 19 September 2021 (UTC) reply

"One-sided information"

I reverted these edits on the basis of violating WP:NPOV. I doubt that sources prominently describe this person as being widely known for being one-sided, and I likewise doubt that our article should describe her that way. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 05:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The editor of the aforementioned edits is basically a single-purpose account. Judging from the level of grammar and wording, not exactly a good faith editor IMO. Juxlos ( talk) 05:19, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook