![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most of this article is about the original Venetian Gothic style, rather than the revival. The revival can be more broadly classified as "High Victorian Gothic" or "Ruskinian Gothic" (where much of was eclectic it wasn't necessarily from Venetian stylings), which has not its own article, and rightfully deserves one. Would anyone object to that being divided that out, and sumarized/hatnoted from here? Morgan Riley ( talk) 17:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Why do we need to specify that Venetian Gothic is a kind of architecture? What other Venetian Gothic cultural forms are there? I suggest moving the page to Venetian Gothic, which at the moment is a redirect to this page and seems to be a fully satisfactory title. If there's no objection here, I'll probably do that in a day or two; if there's any opposition I'll just drop the idea. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 20:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
The article needs more dates throughout. Even the "History" section has no dates at all. As it is, the reader cannot tell whether the style originated in the 900s or in the 1700s... -- Jorge Stolfi ( talk) 02:44, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most of this article is about the original Venetian Gothic style, rather than the revival. The revival can be more broadly classified as "High Victorian Gothic" or "Ruskinian Gothic" (where much of was eclectic it wasn't necessarily from Venetian stylings), which has not its own article, and rightfully deserves one. Would anyone object to that being divided that out, and sumarized/hatnoted from here? Morgan Riley ( talk) 17:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Why do we need to specify that Venetian Gothic is a kind of architecture? What other Venetian Gothic cultural forms are there? I suggest moving the page to Venetian Gothic, which at the moment is a redirect to this page and seems to be a fully satisfactory title. If there's no objection here, I'll probably do that in a day or two; if there's any opposition I'll just drop the idea. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 20:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
The article needs more dates throughout. Even the "History" section has no dates at all. As it is, the reader cannot tell whether the style originated in the 900s or in the 1700s... -- Jorge Stolfi ( talk) 02:44, 15 April 2019 (UTC)