![]() | Vanille has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Vanille is part of the Final Fantasy XIII series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 11, 2023. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that according to artist
Tetsuya Nomura,
Vanille's attire took inspiration from the
Himba people of Namibia? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
@ Cukie Gherkin: I realize that this article was formerly at "Oerba Dia Vanille", but that was a mistake IMO. See the RM at Talk:Garnet_(Final_Fantasy)#Requested_move_4_April_2021 for an example - she's called Vanille 99% of the time both in-game, and in journalism. For fictional characters, Wikipedia doesn't treat them as if they were real people and use full names, it just uses the most prominent name in fiction - which would be Vanille (Final Fantasy) in this case. Any objection to such a move?
I also think you're playing it a bit fast & loose with that Mattie Brice blog post. First, it's a single blog post that got all of one comment - I think extracting three whole sentences worth of criticism from it is undue weight. Second, I really don't see a strong connection on the gender transition bit - she talks about that in one paragraph, sure, but as part of a general stance thing. Relevant to an article on Brice, but probably not on Vanille. I think that if the reference is kept at all, it can be reduced to something like a single sentence of "Brice praises Vanille as an example of heroism whose impact on the party come from traditionally feminine traits" or the like. SnowFire ( talk) 21:54, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tintor2 ( talk · contribs) 23:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Passing review. Tintor2 ( talk) 03:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC) I'll be reviewing this article this weekend. It looks passable but I have yet to fully read it. Tintor2 ( talk) 23:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC) Well, let's go by the first sections:
@ Kung Fu Man: That's all until this section. Will comment on the rest since it's kinda long. Tintor2 ( talk) 00:43, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
@ Kung Fu Man:
That's all. Tintor2 ( talk) 03:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
23:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Kung Fu Man ( talk). Self-nominated at 16:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Vanille; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
![]() | Vanille has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Vanille is part of the Final Fantasy XIII series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 11, 2023. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that according to artist
Tetsuya Nomura,
Vanille's attire took inspiration from the
Himba people of Namibia? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
@ Cukie Gherkin: I realize that this article was formerly at "Oerba Dia Vanille", but that was a mistake IMO. See the RM at Talk:Garnet_(Final_Fantasy)#Requested_move_4_April_2021 for an example - she's called Vanille 99% of the time both in-game, and in journalism. For fictional characters, Wikipedia doesn't treat them as if they were real people and use full names, it just uses the most prominent name in fiction - which would be Vanille (Final Fantasy) in this case. Any objection to such a move?
I also think you're playing it a bit fast & loose with that Mattie Brice blog post. First, it's a single blog post that got all of one comment - I think extracting three whole sentences worth of criticism from it is undue weight. Second, I really don't see a strong connection on the gender transition bit - she talks about that in one paragraph, sure, but as part of a general stance thing. Relevant to an article on Brice, but probably not on Vanille. I think that if the reference is kept at all, it can be reduced to something like a single sentence of "Brice praises Vanille as an example of heroism whose impact on the party come from traditionally feminine traits" or the like. SnowFire ( talk) 21:54, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tintor2 ( talk · contribs) 23:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Passing review. Tintor2 ( talk) 03:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC) I'll be reviewing this article this weekend. It looks passable but I have yet to fully read it. Tintor2 ( talk) 23:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC) Well, let's go by the first sections:
@ Kung Fu Man: That's all until this section. Will comment on the rest since it's kinda long. Tintor2 ( talk) 00:43, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
@ Kung Fu Man:
That's all. Tintor2 ( talk) 03:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
23:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Kung Fu Man ( talk). Self-nominated at 16:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Vanille; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |