This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Nordic This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force. Animation: Films Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance). Denmark Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has failed a C-class assessment on several levels.

• WP:FILMPLOT – Plots should be 400–700 words. This is barely 100 words.
• WP:FILMCAST – There is just a basic list, and background information on the casting process should be documented.
• MOS:FILM#Critical_response – There is no coverage of the film's critical reception.
• WP:Verifiability – Most of the claims of the Production section are sourced to http://ftvdb.bfi.org.uk/sift/title/385412?view=credit, but this source does not back up most of what is stated. The box-office section is also virtually unsourced.

On the plus side, the article is fairly well structured and provides the skeleton of what should be a good article, but it requires a lot more development. Betty Logan ( talk) 17:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC) reply