This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Utopia for Realists article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Created article Rutger Bregman with some content from Dutch Wikipedia and from this article Utopia for Realists (book). Oceanflynn ( talk) 05:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Drmies: How is a reference to a publisher's website "spammy"? 201Q ( talk) 03:33, 22 February 2019 (UTC) Again, "direct source" as in the publisher's website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201Q ( talk • contribs) 03:34, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
For the rest of the content, I'd look and see how much can be sourced with the reviews; there's quite a few. Here's a nice interview. This is not worth the effort. This is worth citing, and so is this. Drmies ( talk) 04:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Utopia for Realists article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Created article Rutger Bregman with some content from Dutch Wikipedia and from this article Utopia for Realists (book). Oceanflynn ( talk) 05:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Drmies: How is a reference to a publisher's website "spammy"? 201Q ( talk) 03:33, 22 February 2019 (UTC) Again, "direct source" as in the publisher's website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201Q ( talk • contribs) 03:34, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
For the rest of the content, I'd look and see how much can be sourced with the reviews; there's quite a few. Here's a nice interview. This is not worth the effort. This is worth citing, and so is this. Drmies ( talk) 04:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)