 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 15 January 2013, it was proposed that this article be moved to Utah Amendment 3. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
shakeria williams
I do not find this notable enough to put at the end of the page, but the updated statistics are from Yahoo! News: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=index&cid=2288&inc=i_g_ut_1_48530_1.shtml . Iamunknown ( Talk) 08:33, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
We have a page on a legal debate here without any link to the actual text of the amendment. Where is it - surely it is online somewhere?
- This article lacks sources and the claims made in the article should be linked to verifable sources. Please include sources for all claims made in this article especially in the controversy section. Whenever an article of a controversial nature is included in Wikipedia the article should conform to Wikipedia's Reliability, Verifiability, and NPOV policy. Inclusion of sources for controversial information negate the need to remove the information as a result of it being controversial. Edward Lalone 05:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page not moved. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:18, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Utah Constitutional Amendment 3 → Utah Amendment 3 –
- per refs. WP:PRECISION and WP:COMMONNAME 82.132.228.222 ( talk) 21:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose: Not at all sure about this one. Titles should be clear enough that the reader has a vague idea (at least) of what they should expect. To me, Utah Amendment 3 suggests that it is an article about the third change to the boundaries of the state. The existing title is self-explanatory. Skinsmoke ( talk) 02:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- B-Class law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- B-Class LGBT articles
- WikiProject LGBT studies articles
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- Start-Class Utah articles
- Mid-importance Utah articles
- WikiProject Utah articles
- WikiProject United States articles
|
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On 15 January 2013, it was proposed that this article be moved to Utah Amendment 3. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
shakeria williams
I do not find this notable enough to put at the end of the page, but the updated statistics are from Yahoo! News: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=index&cid=2288&inc=i_g_ut_1_48530_1.shtml . Iamunknown ( Talk) 08:33, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
We have a page on a legal debate here without any link to the actual text of the amendment. Where is it - surely it is online somewhere?
- This article lacks sources and the claims made in the article should be linked to verifable sources. Please include sources for all claims made in this article especially in the controversy section. Whenever an article of a controversial nature is included in Wikipedia the article should conform to Wikipedia's Reliability, Verifiability, and NPOV policy. Inclusion of sources for controversial information negate the need to remove the information as a result of it being controversial. Edward Lalone 05:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page not moved. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:18, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Utah Constitutional Amendment 3 → Utah Amendment 3 –
- per refs. WP:PRECISION and WP:COMMONNAME 82.132.228.222 ( talk) 21:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose: Not at all sure about this one. Titles should be clear enough that the reader has a vague idea (at least) of what they should expect. To me, Utah Amendment 3 suggests that it is an article about the third change to the boundaries of the state. The existing title is self-explanatory. Skinsmoke ( talk) 02:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- B-Class law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- B-Class LGBT articles
- WikiProject LGBT studies articles
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- Start-Class Utah articles
- Mid-importance Utah articles
- WikiProject Utah articles
- WikiProject United States articles