![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As with the GNP, the content reads like a media-centric generalization of political parties in Korea. Definately needs better structuring and additional information. And those who like to edit the article, please do so after registering. Showing just an ip really hurts your credibility.
-- Steviecnd 21:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I would prefer to see this page moved to Uri Party. Most English-language media refers to the party as such. Are there any reasons for keeping the page here? -- Iceager 00:44, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
No, it was not my inadvertence to delete a paragraph related to Chinese Communist Party. The paragraph seems just out of context, not in any way worth describing. noirum June 28, 2005 08:39 (UTC)
In what sense is it not worth describing? You don't think that an agreement between Uri and the CCP (which is the main sponsor of the KWP is in any way significant? -- Ce garcon 19:00, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
I took this last paragraph out:
"...while neglecting to devote any attention to the numerous transgressions by North Korea, such as the failure to cooperate with the six party talks, manufacture of counterfeit U.S. dollars, illicit sales of arms to terrorist countries, and border provocations in the demilitarized zone."
While there could be some truth to that statement, until it is sourced and verifiable, and less POV, I don't think it's worth keeping. Paj.meister 22:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Although truly difficult in mind, personally, someone should mention about this recent political chaos(changes) in South Korea. I did it(briefly). Does anyone who help to fill more? Peterhansen2032 08:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Uri Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:09, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As with the GNP, the content reads like a media-centric generalization of political parties in Korea. Definately needs better structuring and additional information. And those who like to edit the article, please do so after registering. Showing just an ip really hurts your credibility.
-- Steviecnd 21:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I would prefer to see this page moved to Uri Party. Most English-language media refers to the party as such. Are there any reasons for keeping the page here? -- Iceager 00:44, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
No, it was not my inadvertence to delete a paragraph related to Chinese Communist Party. The paragraph seems just out of context, not in any way worth describing. noirum June 28, 2005 08:39 (UTC)
In what sense is it not worth describing? You don't think that an agreement between Uri and the CCP (which is the main sponsor of the KWP is in any way significant? -- Ce garcon 19:00, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
I took this last paragraph out:
"...while neglecting to devote any attention to the numerous transgressions by North Korea, such as the failure to cooperate with the six party talks, manufacture of counterfeit U.S. dollars, illicit sales of arms to terrorist countries, and border provocations in the demilitarized zone."
While there could be some truth to that statement, until it is sourced and verifiable, and less POV, I don't think it's worth keeping. Paj.meister 22:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Although truly difficult in mind, personally, someone should mention about this recent political chaos(changes) in South Korea. I did it(briefly). Does anyone who help to fill more? Peterhansen2032 08:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Uri Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:09, 14 December 2017 (UTC)