![]() | United States v. LaMacchia was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 20, 2011). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | A fact from United States v. LaMacchia appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 December 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hey,
Great job creating a new article. I have some simple and substantial changes to your article that I would like to propose.
The rest of my suggestions are more trivial. I'll automatically apply them, but leave this note up so that you can know what I did and why =]
Drozycki16 ( talk) 03:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for these points, I've made some of the changes you suggested. VM 05:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psykonautiks ( talk • contribs)
Hey--definitely agree with the points above. I also went ahead and just changed the order around a bit under the Court Decision section so that the final decision was listed explicitly first, followed by the factors/criteria behind it. Feel free to edit it further/change it back if you think that may be better. Misbahuz ( talk) 04:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
What is an encrypted address? 12.34.56.78 is an address. So is thisismyaddress.com. They're not something you can encrypt. You can encrypt the data being sent to/from a site, otherwise known as a secure connection. Or you can not publish a domain name to a DNS, so the address is just the IPv4 numbers rather than the human readable .com address. But that's still not encryption. It's stated as such due to the official court document, but I have little faith of the court system circa 1994 to have any clue about what they're talking about when it comes to the digital domain. 12.234.226.200 ( talk) 15:20, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an
educational assignment at Yale University supported by
WikiProject Law and the
Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available
on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
16:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() | United States v. LaMacchia was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 20, 2011). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | A fact from United States v. LaMacchia appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 December 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hey,
Great job creating a new article. I have some simple and substantial changes to your article that I would like to propose.
The rest of my suggestions are more trivial. I'll automatically apply them, but leave this note up so that you can know what I did and why =]
Drozycki16 ( talk) 03:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for these points, I've made some of the changes you suggested. VM 05:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psykonautiks ( talk • contribs)
Hey--definitely agree with the points above. I also went ahead and just changed the order around a bit under the Court Decision section so that the final decision was listed explicitly first, followed by the factors/criteria behind it. Feel free to edit it further/change it back if you think that may be better. Misbahuz ( talk) 04:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
What is an encrypted address? 12.34.56.78 is an address. So is thisismyaddress.com. They're not something you can encrypt. You can encrypt the data being sent to/from a site, otherwise known as a secure connection. Or you can not publish a domain name to a DNS, so the address is just the IPv4 numbers rather than the human readable .com address. But that's still not encryption. It's stated as such due to the official court document, but I have little faith of the court system circa 1994 to have any clue about what they're talking about when it comes to the digital domain. 12.234.226.200 ( talk) 15:20, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an
educational assignment at Yale University supported by
WikiProject Law and the
Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available
on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
16:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)