This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 30 |
Whoever listed the form of government of the United States as "Federal Empire" instead of "Federal Republic" is clearly advancing an agenda. "Empire" seems a far too controversial term. Very funny though...
Why is the US defined as a country when it is in fact a federation? Foofighter20x 23:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
The US is a country. Even if it has states it's still a country. Most countries have provinces or states or prefectures or whatever, but they're all countries.
Thought most countries' "states" don't have as high a degree of autonomy as a federation :-) Henners91 06:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Since when is the US referred to as Beano? Omg starburst 00:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
I cahanged the infobox to read "Speaker of the House", instead of "House Speaker", as the former is her proper title. -- R'son-W (speak to me/ breathe) 21:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Why isn't there an " (R)" by his name when all the other people in government have there party listed by their names.-- 71.170.41.7 19:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I was just comparing the ecomonomy of Ireland and the USA when I noticed that the USA's GDP/PPP was ranked as third. Irelands was ranked as fourth despite being higher...
The US has 50 states, not 55. The article seems to be locked, I don't care to find out why, so I cannot correct it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 148.177.68.50 ( talk) 22:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC).
Under the sub-article "Culture" is another smaller article titled "Science." Does this science article belong within culture? Should it be integrated within the "innovation" sub-article? Or does it have any real significance at all? Abdalla 01:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
System of Goverment: Could somebody add the word "Presidential" in there somewhere. It doesn't make sense to list France as semi presidential if the prime example of full presidential is not listed that way. The consistency in the format of the info boxes implies a certain cosistency in the info provided. Know what I mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
This article is way too large. Perhaps it would be better to put some of the information into the main articles and chop off some unimportant info. See here. Universe=atom 15:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Is this article really necessary? I don't see how it's important enough to keep. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.251.246.130 ( talk) 02:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC).
This article is very important. It is a compilation of information about the subculture of "Military brats" which are more prevalent than you believe.
In the economics section, it is stated that the US is the worlds largest importer and the 2nd largest exporter. Well somebody should really look into that because the US is actually the worlds largest exporter as well.
Trivia note: While the article's source is over 119K at the moment, the rendered page's body is only 64226 bytes long, well within the guidelines at WP:LENGTH for a significant topic. Way to go with the with the references, folks. MrZaius talk 13:04, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
The facts in this article are incorrect. The largest countries in the world rank 1. Russia, 2. Canada, then 3. USA. The USA is not larger than Canada.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.233.121.29 ( talk • contribs)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 30 |
Whoever listed the form of government of the United States as "Federal Empire" instead of "Federal Republic" is clearly advancing an agenda. "Empire" seems a far too controversial term. Very funny though...
Why is the US defined as a country when it is in fact a federation? Foofighter20x 23:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
The US is a country. Even if it has states it's still a country. Most countries have provinces or states or prefectures or whatever, but they're all countries.
Thought most countries' "states" don't have as high a degree of autonomy as a federation :-) Henners91 06:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Since when is the US referred to as Beano? Omg starburst 00:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
I cahanged the infobox to read "Speaker of the House", instead of "House Speaker", as the former is her proper title. -- R'son-W (speak to me/ breathe) 21:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Why isn't there an " (R)" by his name when all the other people in government have there party listed by their names.-- 71.170.41.7 19:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I was just comparing the ecomonomy of Ireland and the USA when I noticed that the USA's GDP/PPP was ranked as third. Irelands was ranked as fourth despite being higher...
The US has 50 states, not 55. The article seems to be locked, I don't care to find out why, so I cannot correct it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 148.177.68.50 ( talk) 22:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC).
Under the sub-article "Culture" is another smaller article titled "Science." Does this science article belong within culture? Should it be integrated within the "innovation" sub-article? Or does it have any real significance at all? Abdalla 01:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
System of Goverment: Could somebody add the word "Presidential" in there somewhere. It doesn't make sense to list France as semi presidential if the prime example of full presidential is not listed that way. The consistency in the format of the info boxes implies a certain cosistency in the info provided. Know what I mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
This article is way too large. Perhaps it would be better to put some of the information into the main articles and chop off some unimportant info. See here. Universe=atom 15:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Is this article really necessary? I don't see how it's important enough to keep. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.251.246.130 ( talk) 02:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC).
This article is very important. It is a compilation of information about the subculture of "Military brats" which are more prevalent than you believe.
In the economics section, it is stated that the US is the worlds largest importer and the 2nd largest exporter. Well somebody should really look into that because the US is actually the worlds largest exporter as well.
Trivia note: While the article's source is over 119K at the moment, the rendered page's body is only 64226 bytes long, well within the guidelines at WP:LENGTH for a significant topic. Way to go with the with the references, folks. MrZaius talk 13:04, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
The facts in this article are incorrect. The largest countries in the world rank 1. Russia, 2. Canada, then 3. USA. The USA is not larger than Canada.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.233.121.29 ( talk • contribs)