Unbreakable (2005) has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 11, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Unbreakable (2005) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Unbreakable (2005) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 31 January 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The result of the debate was Move. — Wknight94 ( talk) 19:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
TNA Unbreakable 2005 → TNA Unbreakable – No other TNA PPV has used this name and a new one has not been announced. Following precedents like WWF InVasion and Tuesday in Texas TJ Spyke 04:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
Add any additional comments
I fixed the page. Most of the results were squashed to 1 side because the posters position 244pupil6
is the reason y is called Unbreakable is coz it happened on september 11 and to say that they are unbreakable from the attaks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.143.115 ( talk) 06:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
how do u do that-- 121.220.29.13 ( talk) 10:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri ( talk · contribs) 16:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC) I'll take this one. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 16:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC) Good Article Checklist
Good Article review progress box
|
Comments: This article needs to be copyeditted for prose and better separate fact from fiction. The problematic section is the Aftermath section.
When I originally reviewed this, it looked like it had more issues than it really did, but I think just some quick editing and clarifying the details will make it passable. Placing on hold for fixes. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 14:24, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Unbreakable (2005) has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 11, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Unbreakable (2005) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Unbreakable (2005) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 31 January 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The result of the debate was Move. — Wknight94 ( talk) 19:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
TNA Unbreakable 2005 → TNA Unbreakable – No other TNA PPV has used this name and a new one has not been announced. Following precedents like WWF InVasion and Tuesday in Texas TJ Spyke 04:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
Add any additional comments
I fixed the page. Most of the results were squashed to 1 side because the posters position 244pupil6
is the reason y is called Unbreakable is coz it happened on september 11 and to say that they are unbreakable from the attaks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.143.115 ( talk) 06:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
how do u do that-- 121.220.29.13 ( talk) 10:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri ( talk · contribs) 16:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC) I'll take this one. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 16:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC) Good Article Checklist
Good Article review progress box
|
Comments: This article needs to be copyeditted for prose and better separate fact from fiction. The problematic section is the Aftermath section.
When I originally reviewed this, it looked like it had more issues than it really did, but I think just some quick editing and clarifying the details will make it passable. Placing on hold for fixes. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 14:24, 7 January 2014 (UTC)