![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The first numbered list could do with an introduction. It is unclear to me what it is a list of. -- SandStone ( talk) 03:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Just thought I'd mention that "sparking a raft of satellite litigation" is quite a cocktail of metaphors. 134.134.139.71 ( talk) 19:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
From the article as it stands as of 20061208: "# If the contract was fully executory, the defense of ultra vires might be raised by either party."
Should that instead read "executed?" The next sentence ("# If the contract was partially performed, and the performance was held to be insufficient to bring the doctrine of estoppel into play, a suit for quasi contract for recovery of benefits conferred was available."), if it is meant to be parallel to that one, makes me think that "executed" is the right word, but since this isn't something I've seen covered in class yet, I am reluctant to change if there's a better explanation. So ... is there? :)
Cheers,
timbo 15:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
In the Constitutional Law section, it states that ultra vires is "Almost unheard of in modern times". In Canada, certain parts of Manitoba's and Quebec's language laws were found to be ultra vires by the Supreme Court of Canada in 1978. Could someone more qualified than I please make reference to this in the article? CWPappas ( talk) 05:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
The introduction doesn't concisely explain what the phrase means. If theres a latin definition but it's used in common law, there should be a comprable plain english definition of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.132.80.134 ( talk) 21:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Several governments and their constitutional tribunals claim that the EU has limited entitlements. Xx236 ( talk) 11:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The first numbered list could do with an introduction. It is unclear to me what it is a list of. -- SandStone ( talk) 03:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Just thought I'd mention that "sparking a raft of satellite litigation" is quite a cocktail of metaphors. 134.134.139.71 ( talk) 19:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
From the article as it stands as of 20061208: "# If the contract was fully executory, the defense of ultra vires might be raised by either party."
Should that instead read "executed?" The next sentence ("# If the contract was partially performed, and the performance was held to be insufficient to bring the doctrine of estoppel into play, a suit for quasi contract for recovery of benefits conferred was available."), if it is meant to be parallel to that one, makes me think that "executed" is the right word, but since this isn't something I've seen covered in class yet, I am reluctant to change if there's a better explanation. So ... is there? :)
Cheers,
timbo 15:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
In the Constitutional Law section, it states that ultra vires is "Almost unheard of in modern times". In Canada, certain parts of Manitoba's and Quebec's language laws were found to be ultra vires by the Supreme Court of Canada in 1978. Could someone more qualified than I please make reference to this in the article? CWPappas ( talk) 05:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
The introduction doesn't concisely explain what the phrase means. If theres a latin definition but it's used in common law, there should be a comprable plain english definition of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.132.80.134 ( talk) 21:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Several governments and their constitutional tribunals claim that the EU has limited entitlements. Xx236 ( talk) 11:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)