U Me Aur Hum has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 5, 2021. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Indian This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force. India: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 4 October 2021.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

• The Hindu, music review -- Nicholas Michael Halim ( talk) 12:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC) reply
• The Hindu, anticipation -- Nicholas Michael Halim ( talk) 12:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC) reply
• The Hindu, Anna Singh's costume design
• The Hindu, cameo
• The Hindu, Ziya Us Salam's review -- Nicholas Michael Halim ( talk) 12:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC) reply
• The Hindu, Sudhish Kamath's review
• The Hindu, failure -- Nicholas Michael Halim ( talk) 12:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC) reply
• "'Kajol and I didn't even propose to each other!'", Rediff.com
• Rediff.com, music review
• "‘I’ve not made a great film but I’ve tried to make an honest one’", The Indian Express -- Nicholas Michael Halim ( talk) 12:39, 20 May 2021 (UTC) reply

The film was released on 11 April 2008 in around 450 cinemas (with 150 of them being digital screens). ^[1] The film bears resemblance to the 2004 film, The Notebook. ^[2]

References

1. ^ "Krazzy 4 Has a Big Release". U, Me aur Hum releases around 450 cinemas. Retrieved 12 April 2008.
2. ^ "Masand's Verdict: U, Me Aur Hum | Krazzy 4".

-- Nicholas Michael Halim ( talk) 11:38, 23 May 2021 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:U Me Aur Hum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk · contribs) 03:57, 5 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments

• Please improve the poster's non-free use rationale with this template.
• I could not find any issues with the lead. Infobox also looks good.
• "The newly-married couple begin" → "The newly-married couple begins"
• In #Production, add a serial comma after Sutanu Gupta and "Gundaraj (1995)".
• In #Soundtrack, 'a "innocent' should be 'an "innocent'.
• "better-received by overseas" – reword
• Remove the hyphen between "review-aggregator".
• Mark references from The Hindu with "|url-access=subcription".
• Like always, your articles are properly cited with reliable sources. Great job!

Done. — Nicholas Michael Halim ( talk) 09:42, 5 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Progress

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed