This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That does not sound like proper terminology, but I am not a pilot.
I changed it to deflected, that's the terminology I have heard most frequently for aircraft control surfaces. Theshoestore ( talk) 09:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Truth, is they left the rudder trim in the wrong position and failed to correct it prior to take off . jacob805
I will remove the template that this section is not adequately cited, for these reasons:
At the beginning of that section, is this statement:
And then, each of those problems was listed, in bulleted form, and then at the end of the last bullet, the one sole citation is given: The official NTSB report on that accident.
If some of those bulleted findings had come from a variety of other sources, then I would have added additional source citations. But, since each is part of that report, and the paragraph starts out by clearly saying that they were the findings of the NTSB, then the only source for all of that is that one NTSB report. And, that citation was there when the non-cited template was inserted.
I cannot add additional citations, because there are none. All of it comes from the official NTSB report and that was and is properly cited. EditorASC ( talk) 18:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
USAir Flight 5050. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That does not sound like proper terminology, but I am not a pilot.
I changed it to deflected, that's the terminology I have heard most frequently for aircraft control surfaces. Theshoestore ( talk) 09:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Truth, is they left the rudder trim in the wrong position and failed to correct it prior to take off . jacob805
I will remove the template that this section is not adequately cited, for these reasons:
At the beginning of that section, is this statement:
And then, each of those problems was listed, in bulleted form, and then at the end of the last bullet, the one sole citation is given: The official NTSB report on that accident.
If some of those bulleted findings had come from a variety of other sources, then I would have added additional source citations. But, since each is part of that report, and the paragraph starts out by clearly saying that they were the findings of the NTSB, then the only source for all of that is that one NTSB report. And, that citation was there when the non-cited template was inserted.
I cannot add additional citations, because there are none. All of it comes from the official NTSB report and that was and is properly cited. EditorASC ( talk) 18:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
USAir Flight 5050. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)