This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ice Hockey This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles United States Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hey, 64.26.167.97, if you're gonna vandalize a Wikipedia article (not that I'm for it), maybe try logging in? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ezlo4 ( talk • contribs) 01:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC) reply

The version 14:45, 24 February 2020‎ Flibirigit of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia.-- Wing ( talk) 11:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply

An editor deleted highly notable recent news - a letter to USA Hockey from a senior US Senator. This is highly notable. It is clearly appropriate, per wp:recentism. We don't delete recent news of this level of relevance on the basis of IDONTLIKEIT. -- 2603:7000:2143:8500:D98D:5F53:E76A:9FB ( talk) 05:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC) reply

The "potential interference" is not encyclopedic and violates recentism. Flibirigit ( talk) 10:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC) reply