From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


I did a copy edit of the page. I changed organisation to organization, because it is the sole spelling used in the US and quite common in the UK, as well. I also changed the British "redundancies" to the US "layoffs", but I don't know the Wikipedia policy on this. Most US speakers do not know what "redundancies" means. Apollo ( talk) 21:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Basically, Wikipedia has no preference towards British or American english, merely requesting consistency throughout an article (though the story is a bit different on subject related to one of the english speaking countries). See WP:ENGVAR. Equendil Talk 22:58, 28 September 2008 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


I did a copy edit of the page. I changed organisation to organization, because it is the sole spelling used in the US and quite common in the UK, as well. I also changed the British "redundancies" to the US "layoffs", but I don't know the Wikipedia policy on this. Most US speakers do not know what "redundancies" means. Apollo ( talk) 21:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Basically, Wikipedia has no preference towards British or American english, merely requesting consistency throughout an article (though the story is a bit different on subject related to one of the english speaking countries). See WP:ENGVAR. Equendil Talk 22:58, 28 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook