Typhoon Krosa (2013) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 1, 2014. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Typhoons in the Philippines#Public Storm Warning Signals|number 3 warning signal]] The anchor (#Public Storm Warning Signals) has been deleted. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Are jtwc tracks free work or copyrighted non free work but free use?-- ItsPaide ( talk) 16:35, 3 November 2013 (UTC) reply

They are considered to be in the Public Domain and thus are "Free Works". Jason Rees ( talk) 17:21, 3 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks-- ItsPaide ( talk) 19:25, 3 November 2013 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Krosa (2013)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 ( talk · contribs) 00:16, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Hurricanehink, I will be reviewing Typhoon Krosa (2013) for GAN today. Anyway, this is gonna be my first Good Article review of 2014!

• "VNCHMF designation: Bão số 12 )" - What is VNCHMF?
  • No idea, removed it. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
• "that made landfall in the northern Philippines on October 31, 2013." - Is the exact full date necessary? Why not just "in October 2013"?
  • Changed, and addressed subsequent date changes. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
• "It formed several days prior near Guam, and slowly intensified while moving westward." - I think you are gonna need to find a better word to start that sentence. What formed several days prior near Guam, the Philippines? Also, if you decide to remove the exact full date from the previous sentence, state the date here.
  • Changed. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
• "It formed several days prior near Guam," - Wikilink Guam?
  • K. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
• "including 3,000 that were destroyed, and caused four fatalities." - Infobox says 9 fatalities. Am I missing something?
  • Hmm, not sure. I changed the infobox. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
• "High winds and rainfall left P277 million (PHP, $6.4 million USD) in damage." - Were all the damage totals from 2013? :P
  • Yep :D --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
• "While approaching northern Luzon, Krosa quickly intensified as the initial eye feature organized into a well-defined eye" - Shouldn't start a new paragraph without including the date in the first sentence.
  • Added. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
• " west-southwest due to a new ridge." - Is this a subtropical ridge or simply a ridge (meteorology)? If the latter, please wikilink.
  • Source doesn't clarify, but I don't think it's needed, honestly. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
• "a car crashed into a gasoline truck due to power outages." - A car accident due to a power outage? Was it too dark or something?
  • Yea, apparently. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
• "a "yellow alert" – the second-lowest of four warning" - This might be easier to understand if you said something like "the second-lowest of the four level warning system".
  • Did as suggested. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
• On reference #3, the publisher reads "INQUIRER.net." However, I did a little bit of digging and found out that this is really Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  • Thanks, changed. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
• Why are the accessdates for references 5 and 6 in the date-month-year numerical format? Fix these accessdate so that there format is consistent with the other references.
  • Fixed. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
• The remaining sections of the article look good. Therefore, this is probably all the issues that I believe must be fixed before I can list this as a Good Article. Happy new year and good luck in the WikiCup!-- 12george1 ( talk) 00:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Thanks a lot! --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
    • Nice work, Hurricanehink! I am now going to pass this article and list it as a GA.-- 12george1 ( talk) 21:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply