This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basque, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Basque Country,
Basque people,
Basque language, history and culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasqueWikipedia:WikiProject BasqueTemplate:WikiProject BasqueBasque articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
Consider joining this project's
Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section
Note: These lists are
transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
One Source tag
Good evening all. I know there are many sources listed, but the majority of the article relies on just one chapter in a reader: - Plaza, Joseba Txoko in Wandler, R. (ed) Euskadi Walter Frey 1999
ISBN9783925867385. Unfortunately this is a non-English language source and not, as far as I can tell, available on line.
Please can any editor find (preferably English language) sources for this article. Also, can anyone find and provide transations of the relevant pats of the ref above, please?
The cleanup of stuff like the Facebook "source" aside, I'm rather dismayed at your approach to this article. You clearly know nothing about the context of the txoko and what you call guff, is the wider cultural context of the txoko, on in which things such as the ban on discussing politics have had a significant role in, amongst other things, providing a safe space for the Basque language during the Francoist suppression. I'm not sure I want to spend any time contributing any more to this page if someone can just come, do a slash and burn and move on to the next topic they presumably know zilch about.
Akerbeltz (
talk)
11:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Hopefully you have seen the edits in which I had added sourced material to the article, and if you look at my other edits you will see that I am far from being a "slash and burn" editor. Let's
WP:AGF and work together to improve the article.
Springnuts (
talk)
19:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Sections on running and organising
There are real problems with including excessive detail and relying on one, hard to find, non-English source. Please can we have some translations of the relevant part of the source to help to determine its
due weight and the correct level of
detail. Friendly regards,
Springnuts (
talk)
18:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Well newsflash, some topics aren't so well researched that they all meet the exacting standards of an online anyone-can-mess-around encyclopedia. Yes, if I had 3 clones of myself, I would have looked for more sources but hey, I don't and it's hardly a controversial topic that invites edit wars (at least until you showed up) so I figured padding out the original stub based on a source I happened to have to hand was a good thing to do. Apparently not.
As for excessive detail, who are you to judge what's extensive or not? You seem to know next to nothing about the topic or its wider context. There's a reason scientific journals do *peer* review, not "anyone whose read the editorial rules reviews".
Akerbeltz (
talk)
10:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basque, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Basque Country,
Basque people,
Basque language, history and culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasqueWikipedia:WikiProject BasqueTemplate:WikiProject BasqueBasque articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
Consider joining this project's
Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section
Note: These lists are
transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
One Source tag
Good evening all. I know there are many sources listed, but the majority of the article relies on just one chapter in a reader: - Plaza, Joseba Txoko in Wandler, R. (ed) Euskadi Walter Frey 1999
ISBN9783925867385. Unfortunately this is a non-English language source and not, as far as I can tell, available on line.
Please can any editor find (preferably English language) sources for this article. Also, can anyone find and provide transations of the relevant pats of the ref above, please?
The cleanup of stuff like the Facebook "source" aside, I'm rather dismayed at your approach to this article. You clearly know nothing about the context of the txoko and what you call guff, is the wider cultural context of the txoko, on in which things such as the ban on discussing politics have had a significant role in, amongst other things, providing a safe space for the Basque language during the Francoist suppression. I'm not sure I want to spend any time contributing any more to this page if someone can just come, do a slash and burn and move on to the next topic they presumably know zilch about.
Akerbeltz (
talk)
11:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Hopefully you have seen the edits in which I had added sourced material to the article, and if you look at my other edits you will see that I am far from being a "slash and burn" editor. Let's
WP:AGF and work together to improve the article.
Springnuts (
talk)
19:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Sections on running and organising
There are real problems with including excessive detail and relying on one, hard to find, non-English source. Please can we have some translations of the relevant part of the source to help to determine its
due weight and the correct level of
detail. Friendly regards,
Springnuts (
talk)
18:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Well newsflash, some topics aren't so well researched that they all meet the exacting standards of an online anyone-can-mess-around encyclopedia. Yes, if I had 3 clones of myself, I would have looked for more sources but hey, I don't and it's hardly a controversial topic that invites edit wars (at least until you showed up) so I figured padding out the original stub based on a source I happened to have to hand was a good thing to do. Apparently not.
As for excessive detail, who are you to judge what's extensive or not? You seem to know next to nothing about the topic or its wider context. There's a reason scientific journals do *peer* review, not "anyone whose read the editorial rules reviews".
Akerbeltz (
talk)
10:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)reply