Tsubasa Reservoir Chronicle the Movie: The Princess in the Birdcage Kingdom was nominated as a Language and literature good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 26, 2016). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anime and manga Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Film: Comic book / Japanese This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Comic book films task force. This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force. Comics: Films Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Comic book films work group. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on February 24, 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Princess in the Birdcage Kingdom/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Narutolovehinata5 ( talk · contribs) 13:16, 12 March 2016 (UTC) reply

I, Narutolovehinata5, will be reviewing this article.

@ Tintor2: The article is almost there (I feel the plot section might be a bit too short but given that it's a film and not a series it wouldn't be right either to describe every plot detail). But right now I'm seeing a glaring issue with the article: there's no detailed discussion on the film's theatrical release! Is there any information available for that, online or otherwise? For example, does information about promotional events, coverage about the premiere itself, box-office performance, etc. exist? Because unless that issue is resolved or cannot be resolved due to sources being unavailable I would fail this right now. And as an aside, are there any sales figures for the home release of the film? Because that could be a worthwhile addition to the reception section. As for the development section, do interviews with the film's theme song singers, comments by them, or otherwise discussion on the film's music exist? A somewhat more complete discussion on the film's music, similar to Puella Magi Madoka Magica would make for interesting reading.

In addition to this, while this is optional and thus not a pressing concern, do Japanese reviews for the film exist? Because it would interesting to see how Japanese reviewers and audiences received the film.

I also discovered a minor typo in the Plot section: it should be "it was Kawasaki's first animated film" or "it was the director's first film" as opposed to "it was director's first film".

Result:  On hold pending the issues I have raised being addressed. Narutolovehinata5 ^{t c csd new} 13:16, 12 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the review @ Narutolovehinata5:. I added the premiere date in the development section. As about the plot's length, the problem is that it's only 35 minutes long. There was also no original soundtrack as it used the ones from the tv series. The two theme songs were released as singles. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 14:04, 12 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Well, you still didn't address some of my other concerns. But I can wait. Narutolovehinata5 ^{t c csd new} 14:42, 12 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Sorry. I was kinda busy. I tried fixing the director's problem. Also, I don't know if I can find a Japanese review and even I could, I'm unable to read that language. @ Narutolovehinata5: Tintor2 ( talk) 20:23, 12 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Anyway, while I understand that you cannot understand Japanese, the information I'm looking for (box-office performance and other theatrical release information) might be available in sites like Box Office Mojo. Also, it's possible for you to use Google Translate to get at least basic information. Narutolovehinata5 ^{t c csd new} 01:05, 13 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Sadly I can't find anything even in the Box Office Mojo. Fail the article if you will. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 01:49, 13 March 2016 (UTC) reply

So it seems that the information I'm asking about for the article probably doesn't exist, at least not online. As such, I'm going to request a second opinion for this one. Narutolovehinata5 ^{t c csd new} 01:59, 13 March 2016 (UTC) reply

I will give Tintor2 until the 19th to address the article's issues (whether through editing or explaining), particularly on the issue of a lack of discussion for the movie's release, as well as its box-office and home video performances. If these are not address this will be at best a 50-50. Narutolovehinata5 ^{t c csd new} 06:28, 15 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Narutolovehinata5 I'm afraid you'll have to fail because the only site with sales Kaze is dead. Still, good work reviewing this article. Tintor2 ( talk) 13:59, 15 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Normally, I would fail this article now given that the primary author admits that some of my concers were unable to be addressed. However, Tintor2 has implicitly suggested that coverage about the film is either limited or no longer available. As such, the article's content might only be representative of whatever sources are available. Given the circumstances, and my own lack of experience in reviewing GANs, I'm requesting a second opinion for this one. I already did above, but I kind of messed up with the process, so this time I'm making it formal. Narutolovehinata5 ^{t c csd new} 03:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Narutolovehinata5 User:Tintor2 is apparently endorsing a quickfail of the article because of citation and reference articles no longer being available. See the recent quickfails for The Revenant (2015 film) and for Sonnet 129 to see if their approach is applicable. If the references are no longer available here in this article you might also add a citation template in the article to specify this issue. Fountains-of-Paris ( talk) 15:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the second opinion but I think this one is different from The Revenant (2015 film) because it's regarded as a short film. Also, Sonnet 129 appears to be quite different. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 17:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Given that the second opinion has also recommended failing the GA, I am sorry to say that this GAN has not passed. Nevertheless, Tintor2 did a good job in the article and did his best in improving it. As a consolation, I have assessed the article as C-class as opposed to Start-class, and it should be good enough for B-class with a little more work. Narutolovehinata5 ^{t c csd new} 00:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply