This article was nominated for deletion on 14 July 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from
http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/ca8753en. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by
VRT volunteers, under ticket number
2020073010003087. See
File:Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020 – Key findings.pdf This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
I have copied the above from the "Tropical dry forest" page: I would suggest that its importance is actually high and find the proposal for deletion ( Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tropical_forest) most unfortunate. Note: this debate started in 2012 and can be found on Talk:Tropical_and_subtropical_moist_broadleaf_forests - I found the comments there by User:Grolltech very appropriate, especially: "Ideally, each of the unlinked terms above might someday get their own page, but until then, they point here (or at least they should). To redirect them all to rainforest or to tropical forest (a term which which includes tropical dry broadleaf forests and tropical coniferous forests, by the way) would certainly not be in anyone's best interest. And seriously, forest? We might as well just redirect all of these pages to Earth, and leave it at that."
I have suggested that the purpose of this page is:
I reverted Filat25's page move. Tropical forest is the normal term here. Guettarda ( talk) 13:12, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 July 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from
http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/ca8753en. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by
VRT volunteers, under ticket number
2020073010003087. See
File:Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020 – Key findings.pdf This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
I have copied the above from the "Tropical dry forest" page: I would suggest that its importance is actually high and find the proposal for deletion ( Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tropical_forest) most unfortunate. Note: this debate started in 2012 and can be found on Talk:Tropical_and_subtropical_moist_broadleaf_forests - I found the comments there by User:Grolltech very appropriate, especially: "Ideally, each of the unlinked terms above might someday get their own page, but until then, they point here (or at least they should). To redirect them all to rainforest or to tropical forest (a term which which includes tropical dry broadleaf forests and tropical coniferous forests, by the way) would certainly not be in anyone's best interest. And seriously, forest? We might as well just redirect all of these pages to Earth, and leave it at that."
I have suggested that the purpose of this page is:
I reverted Filat25's page move. Tropical forest is the normal term here. Guettarda ( talk) 13:12, 29 February 2020 (UTC)