![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 March 2015. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
@ Koala15: you can't just assume notability. You have to prove it according to the standards of Wikipedia:Notability_(films). With WP:RS, you have to show that "[it] has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." It shouldn't be too hard if the film is really notable.-- Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 17:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Shibbolethink - WP:NOTFILM first details WP:GNG under the heading "General principles". The "Other evidence of notability" is exactly that - other evidence. 99 times out of 100, a film will meet WP:GNG and be a de-facto keep at an AfD. If you want to discuss this more, please raise it at the Film Project. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:43, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 March 2015. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
@ Koala15: you can't just assume notability. You have to prove it according to the standards of Wikipedia:Notability_(films). With WP:RS, you have to show that "[it] has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." It shouldn't be too hard if the film is really notable.-- Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 17:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Shibbolethink - WP:NOTFILM first details WP:GNG under the heading "General principles". The "Other evidence of notability" is exactly that - other evidence. 99 times out of 100, a film will meet WP:GNG and be a de-facto keep at an AfD. If you want to discuss this more, please raise it at the Film Project. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:43, 26 March 2015 (UTC)