![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
regarding ref.2 (the arkivoc paper): I read the paper and as far as I can tell there's no mention of molecular motors, not even in the references. The paper is mainly on synthesis of triptycene derivatives, and there's no relevance to motors. I do suggest to remove it, or have it reference to a different section in the triptycene wiki. I'm with gerrit ( talk) 10:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
This page easily has the worst chemdraw images I've ever seen. The infobox image shows the three rings as being coplanar (!) and the one in the reaction schematic shows two of them almost exactly overlapping. They're worthless, as far as I'm concerned. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.195.18.33 (
talk)
06:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
regarding ref.2 (the arkivoc paper): I read the paper and as far as I can tell there's no mention of molecular motors, not even in the references. The paper is mainly on synthesis of triptycene derivatives, and there's no relevance to motors. I do suggest to remove it, or have it reference to a different section in the triptycene wiki. I'm with gerrit ( talk) 10:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
This page easily has the worst chemdraw images I've ever seen. The infobox image shows the three rings as being coplanar (!) and the one in the reaction schematic shows two of them almost exactly overlapping. They're worthless, as far as I'm concerned. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.195.18.33 (
talk)
06:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)