Trimaran Capital Partners was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reviewer: Sandman888 ( talk) Latest PR 17:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC) On hold If you start with these points and nudge me when you're done, I'll go through the rest of the history section.
See Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Trimaran Capital Partners/1
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Aaron north ( talk) 07:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
I normally do not criticise a recent GA review, because that is usually not helpful, but I will just simply say that I strongly disagree with this: ("Generally, never end a sentence without a reference."). That is not consistent with the 2nd paragraph in verifiability. WP:V Aaron north ( talk) 07:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
I have finished my review. The prose is decent and there's a good amount of interesting information, but this article has a lot of problems. I am skeptical that this article can be fixed in a week. Since the prose is good and the editors had to wait for a renomination after that last odd review I will place it on hold for now rather than failing it. If the article is significantly improved by the end of the weekend or if an editor says they can fix every issue in 7 days then I'll hold it a full week. Otherwise, I'll probably fail it Sunday night. Aaron north ( talk) 23:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
The following is a list of concerns that I believe need to be satisfied to pass review. If you disagree or believe I made an error, please point that out too. Aaron north ( talk) 23:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
The following is a list of other thoughts or suggestions to improve the article. It is not necessary to satisfy these points to meet the GA criteria. Aaron north ( talk) 23:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
The following (in bold) should be replaced with simple neutral language. Aaron north ( talk) 02:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Trimaran Capital Partners. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.peinsider.com/headlines.php?exact=1&hid=18397{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/technology/news/broadview-networks-toting-320m.php{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.peinsider.com/headlines.php?exact=1&hid=28805When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Trimaran Capital Partners was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reviewer: Sandman888 ( talk) Latest PR 17:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC) On hold If you start with these points and nudge me when you're done, I'll go through the rest of the history section.
See Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Trimaran Capital Partners/1
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Aaron north ( talk) 07:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
I normally do not criticise a recent GA review, because that is usually not helpful, but I will just simply say that I strongly disagree with this: ("Generally, never end a sentence without a reference."). That is not consistent with the 2nd paragraph in verifiability. WP:V Aaron north ( talk) 07:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
I have finished my review. The prose is decent and there's a good amount of interesting information, but this article has a lot of problems. I am skeptical that this article can be fixed in a week. Since the prose is good and the editors had to wait for a renomination after that last odd review I will place it on hold for now rather than failing it. If the article is significantly improved by the end of the weekend or if an editor says they can fix every issue in 7 days then I'll hold it a full week. Otherwise, I'll probably fail it Sunday night. Aaron north ( talk) 23:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
The following is a list of concerns that I believe need to be satisfied to pass review. If you disagree or believe I made an error, please point that out too. Aaron north ( talk) 23:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
The following is a list of other thoughts or suggestions to improve the article. It is not necessary to satisfy these points to meet the GA criteria. Aaron north ( talk) 23:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
The following (in bold) should be replaced with simple neutral language. Aaron north ( talk) 02:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Trimaran Capital Partners. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.peinsider.com/headlines.php?exact=1&hid=18397{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/technology/news/broadview-networks-toting-320m.php{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.peinsider.com/headlines.php?exact=1&hid=28805When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)