This article was nominated for deletion on 13 February 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: page to be moved to Investigations involving Benjamin Netanyahu 2016–present per MOS:DATERANGE and MOS:AT.( non-admin closure) Geogene ( talk) 00:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
2016–2018 investigations involving Benjamin Netanyahu →
2016–18 investigations involving Benjamin Netanyahu – consistent wp style
X1\ (
talk)
23:59, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
The article does not appear to cover a real trial (rather than a political propaganda exercise, that happens to be conducted by lawyers ) - it is just abusive, indeed the article ends with the words "shame and disgrace" rather than a verdict on criminal charges. 2A02:C7E:1CC3:8A00:F8EF:AB21:E705:DA1C ( talk) 12:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
The "investigation" has been going on since 2016 and the "trial" has been going on for three years. Where is the verdict? Is this a real trial or political theatre? 2.127.28.72 ( talk) 12:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
The article states that the "trial" started in 2020, but there is no clear account of what the charges were, or what the prosecution and defence arguments were, or what the verdict was. The article even says there will be more "prosecution witnesses" in 2024 (2024? in a trial that started in 2020?) and that the trial is "ongoing" - more than three years after it started. Where is the account of the defence witnesses? Indeed what was the trial even about - again there is no clear description of what the charges may have been. Overall the article is a mess - it does not make any sense. The article seems to be an account of some sort of political theatre rather than a legal proceeding. 2A02:C7C:E124:800:9519:F0A:B4EB:AFE7 ( talk) 06:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Why would the first sentence begin with when Netanyahu was NOT Prime Minister, instead of starting with the trial? It would be more helpful to say when he WAS Prime Minister and then give the years he was in office. CarlSerafino ( talk) 08:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
"There was a vote the next day establishing a House Committee that would debate immunity for Netanyahu; it was approved 16 votes in favour to five against. The committee included 30 members, with a majority from parties opposed to Netanyahu.
As a result, Netanyahu withdrew his bid for immunity on 28 January 2020; the charges against him were thus officially confirmed and filed in Jerusalem District Court on the same day."
What was approved? Why did he withdraw his bid?
75.142.254.3 ( talk) 22:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Shouldn't the title use "Trials" instead of "Trial"? Starlighsky ( talk) 13:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
According to the article the "trial" started on the 24th of May 2024 - the "investigation" having started in 2017 (some seven years ago).
The "process is the punishment" - this is clearly not a trial in any normal sense of that word, in a rational legal system a trial does not go on for year after year, this is clearly a form of political theatre, harassment, and the article should make that clear. 2A02:C7C:E183:AC00:6CD0:D3C2:86E3:400E ( talk) 19:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 13 February 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: page to be moved to Investigations involving Benjamin Netanyahu 2016–present per MOS:DATERANGE and MOS:AT.( non-admin closure) Geogene ( talk) 00:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
2016–2018 investigations involving Benjamin Netanyahu →
2016–18 investigations involving Benjamin Netanyahu – consistent wp style
X1\ (
talk)
23:59, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
The article does not appear to cover a real trial (rather than a political propaganda exercise, that happens to be conducted by lawyers ) - it is just abusive, indeed the article ends with the words "shame and disgrace" rather than a verdict on criminal charges. 2A02:C7E:1CC3:8A00:F8EF:AB21:E705:DA1C ( talk) 12:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
The "investigation" has been going on since 2016 and the "trial" has been going on for three years. Where is the verdict? Is this a real trial or political theatre? 2.127.28.72 ( talk) 12:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
The article states that the "trial" started in 2020, but there is no clear account of what the charges were, or what the prosecution and defence arguments were, or what the verdict was. The article even says there will be more "prosecution witnesses" in 2024 (2024? in a trial that started in 2020?) and that the trial is "ongoing" - more than three years after it started. Where is the account of the defence witnesses? Indeed what was the trial even about - again there is no clear description of what the charges may have been. Overall the article is a mess - it does not make any sense. The article seems to be an account of some sort of political theatre rather than a legal proceeding. 2A02:C7C:E124:800:9519:F0A:B4EB:AFE7 ( talk) 06:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Why would the first sentence begin with when Netanyahu was NOT Prime Minister, instead of starting with the trial? It would be more helpful to say when he WAS Prime Minister and then give the years he was in office. CarlSerafino ( talk) 08:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
"There was a vote the next day establishing a House Committee that would debate immunity for Netanyahu; it was approved 16 votes in favour to five against. The committee included 30 members, with a majority from parties opposed to Netanyahu.
As a result, Netanyahu withdrew his bid for immunity on 28 January 2020; the charges against him were thus officially confirmed and filed in Jerusalem District Court on the same day."
What was approved? Why did he withdraw his bid?
75.142.254.3 ( talk) 22:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Shouldn't the title use "Trials" instead of "Trial"? Starlighsky ( talk) 13:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
According to the article the "trial" started on the 24th of May 2024 - the "investigation" having started in 2017 (some seven years ago).
The "process is the punishment" - this is clearly not a trial in any normal sense of that word, in a rational legal system a trial does not go on for year after year, this is clearly a form of political theatre, harassment, and the article should make that clear. 2A02:C7C:E183:AC00:6CD0:D3C2:86E3:400E ( talk) 19:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)