Hello, Starlighsky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far -- I have enjoyed working with you already. I hope you like it here! Here are a few important links for newcomers:

Wikipedia:Reliable sources, WP:V, WP:CITE and WP:NPOV
How to edit a page; How to develop articles; Editing tutorial
Manual of Style; Writing better articles
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Editing by consensus – working well with other Wikipedians

If you'd like some help with editing or otherwise, you can sign up at the new users log, post a question at the Help Desk, or ask me on my talk page.

As you have already noticed, you should always sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. It is a good idea to read the most recent entries at the bottom of the Talk page of an existing article before making major changes to it, to see if your proposed change has been discussed before. Before I make a major change to an article, I often make a proposal on the Talk page to see if anyone minds.

Again, welcome! -- Ssilvers ( talk) 19:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Vitra Fire Station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Unless you have a source that states that Fritzl was inspired by Sally, we can't say so. See WP:OR for more information. Note that the table is missing No, No, Nanette. Also, would you please re-order the table so that the oldest productions go first? Also, why not include his London stage credits too? Thanks. -- 17:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

These are good points. I just put the productions in that order. I explain in the article that "No, No, Nanette" was a show that he had left when it was a pre-Broadway production. I just added London stage credits to a new table and "No, No, Nanette" to the original table.

The article is coming along well; good job. I bet you can find out more of his early London credits. The George Edwardes shows were very successful, so it would be worthwhile to list more of them in the table. I recommend that, if you look at reviews of them, you try to figure out whether he was really directing them. Often, in those days, director was actually referred to as "stage manager", because he told people where to stand on the stage. Some theatrical history: Prior to the 1860s, there was no such thing as a "director". Shows were usually staged minimally either by the star of the show or by the theatre manager, and actors were pretty much left to their own devices and often mostly devised their own minimalist staging. Plus, the use of the stage was minimal. There were very few rehearsals! If, for example, the play called for a family dinner, a stagehand would bring a table onstage with the number of chairs needed, and everyone would sit down. When the table was no longer needed, the stagehand came back and took it off stage. This was changed by some innovators in the 1860s and 1870s, including T. W. Robertson, who directed the plays that he wrote and expected the actors to rehearse and obey his direction. Early on, the non-playwright directors were called "stage managers". Eventually, they were sometimes called directors (choreography was "musical staging"), although in Britain, directors were sometimes called producers, which is confusing, up until recent decades! -- Ssilvers ( talk) 19:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC) reply

I found the theatre for his British stage credits. Starlighsky ( talk) 03:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC) reply

I found some of his earlier London credits. Btw, we are not allowed to delete discussions from articles' Talk pages (although we can archive them), except in certain limited circumstances. You can delete whatever you want from your own Talk page, but it fools people into thinking that you are a newbie if they don't see older messages here. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 05:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC) reply

I will try to undo it. It was just that the problem was solved. Now I know, thanks. Starlighsky ( talk) 11:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Please see Template:infobox person. The instructions for Parent are: Names of parents; include only if they are independently notable or particularly relevant. For multiple entries, use an inline list. If subject has only one notable mother and/or only one notable father, Schazjmd  (talk) 22:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks Starlighsky ( talk) 22:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Hilary Knight (illustrator)

added links pointing to Hempstead, New York and Eloise

Hugh Ellwood Macbeth Sr.

added a link pointing to Charleston

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Category:American lawyers of Lebanese descent has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat ( talk) 03:52, 11 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yvonne Man. Thanks! Theroadislong ( talk) 19:51, 1 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yvonne Man and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk) 20:39, 1 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Starlighsky! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk) 20:39, 1 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Starlighsky,

Thank you for creating Olsen cycle.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The sources are incorrectly formatted, please correcr

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 ( talk) 14:23, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Ldm1954: Can you explain this in more detail? I want to repair the issue, but am having trouble understanding what exactly the problem is. Starlighsky ( talk) 14:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Starlighsky reply

You first reference does not include the authors, year, page number etc; the second has no information that can be tracked --similar for the others. One approach is to use the automatic citation generator in the visual editor which formats them correctly. For details you can also look at WP:HOWCITE. Ldm1954 ( talk) 14:44, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks, will start on it. Starlighsky ( talk) 14:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Starlighsky reply

I noticed you have been editing some health-related articles, and I wanted to say that a bunch of us hang out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. You're welcome to join us if that's an area of editing that interests you. It's a good place to ask questions about finding good sources for medical content or writing style. Feel free to put the group's page on your watchlist, or stop by to say hello some time. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 02:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks! Starlighsky ( talk) 02:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Starlighsky

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Justiyaya, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Ubiquitous (adverb or adjective), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Justiyaya}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Just i yaya 09:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Sorry Starlighsky, Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary should provide explanation to my reasoning behind the nomination. Wiktionary is the place to go for editing dictionary definitions, not here. If you think I've made a mistake, feel free to remove the tag or ping me to ask questions. Just i yaya 09:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Justiyaya::This article is needed, the present link Ubiquitous links to Omnipresent, which does not explain the word found in many Wikipedia articles. However, that link to omnipresent needs to link to the correct description of ubiquitous.

Once that happens, adjective and adverb can removed from the title. The system won't allow two ubiquitous articles. Ubiquitous needs to link to here Starlighsky ( talk) 13:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ubiquitous (adjective) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubiquitous (adjective) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Deor ( talk) 16:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Zometool. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 23:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I understand. People requested that the article become a separate article to the article about architecture, so I assisted in creating the separate article. I started with a best efforts to find references to the mathematics, but it is incredibly challenging. Starlighsky ( talk) 23:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC) reply

That is exactly why I moved it to draftspace. I hope you are able to find some references because it sounds like it will be a good fit for wikipedia. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 23:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks Starlighsky ( talk) 23:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Starlighsky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:(Midori) Midori Arimoto, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 05:07, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Interesting, but the sources are not enough to satisfy WP:NCORP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grace Shipping Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing ( talk) 13:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henry Sullivan (composer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Sullivan (composer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 21:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

It is 3 Keeps, 100% Keeps for responses in the discussion. Isn't the discussion closed? Starlighsky ( talk) 01:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello - On my talk page, you said: I understand your line of reasoning, but the chart for probability distribution of CI is a standalone. You deleted everything I had written about CI. I am not sure how this can be repaired.

The chart for CI is an example of a statistic, so can stand alone. I don't understand your reasoning to emphasize CI among all the possible statistics, as it is not a rigorous determinant of significance, but rather an indicator of possible range. You also had entitled the section Use in medical literature, a broad section heading, but the content only addressed CI rather than more common and rigorous measures. For style of section subheads, see MOS:SECTIONS (not all caps).

Regarding "repair", this article is basically a WP:STUB and probably should be WP:MERGEd with Biostatistics. Perhaps you could consider working on a merger. As the banner says, the lists should be converted into prose. Also, all content is kept in article history, so everything is recoverable.

You might benefit from this link for formatting references. Check the ref tag, full journal title, and URL boxes. Zefr ( talk) 00:52, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The general reader is not going to understand what CI with a chart and no explanation. I was trying to go from lists to prose. My reasoning what is used often in biomedical literature with a reference to how it used often in such literature. I can use your suggestions to introduce CI and related topics often found in the medical literature.

I will try to work on the merger as well.

All in all, it's no big deal...I just didn't know how to explain the chart with the deletion. Starlighsky ( talk) 01:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Biomass Energy and Alcohol Fuels Act. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 11:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Some of the content is from the legislation by Congress, which is public domain. Starlighsky ( talk) 12:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Michael P. Grace III. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel ( talk) 08:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murray Anderson's Almanac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Starlighsky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jennifer L. Hall (physiologist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 01:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Starlighsky. Thank you for your work on Natural Gas Wellhead Decontrol Act of 1989. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

International Municipal Signal Association

added a link pointing to Rockledge

Noah Dietrich

added a link pointing to Madison

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Starlighsky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gemma Wenger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 11:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024

• IEEE and Haaretz now available
• Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
• Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply