![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Any information as to whether or not this substance causes a glycemic response (spikes your blood sugar) like sucrose, or if it attenuates this response? 0-0-0-Destruct-0 03:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I came to this page having eaten a snack product and read ingredients. I want to know about GI and if there were any other interactions. I had already guessed trehalose might be like maltose - hadn't remembered the term disaccharide at first, just knew maltose was rumoured to have higher gi than glucose due to delivering two glucose molecules at a time. The article mentions sweetness - but how is this connected to GI if at all? I also wondered about any evidence of other health risks - thinking of the heard-of mooting of diabetes-incidence risks of high fructose consumption. Mention here of water-holding properties made me think of glycerine - pregnant women and diabetics are advised caution with that. Not that I am diabetic.So who going to find the info and put it in? I think over all this article is written for undegraduate biochemists and commercial scientists, rather than the interested consumer. Can we do both? We're meant to avoid too much unexplained jargon, aren't we? (feel free to seperate those few last points into a new section - limited time here now). Kathybramley ( talk) 11:27, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Xerobiosis, Is this a real term? Googling it only brings forth two results, both of them mentioned in Wikipedia entries.-- Hooperbloob 03:17, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Added a bit of text based on my own memories of working with the stuff. GDL 1 Feb 2005
Can we get this molecule in the haworth projection? Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 139.62.210.57 ( talk)
Hi, I think the Haworth projection is incorrect. The 2nd sugar should be a-D-glucose but the stereochemistry is inverted. I'll see if I can fix it later unless someone else does it first. I'm not sure what the formating is though. See http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iupac/2carb/36.html for an image of trehalos —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.32.50.98 ( talk) 00:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
The gene for trehalose synthesis was inserted into plants (both chloroplast and nuclear engineering) to investigate use in drought resistance. Rather successful, though it had some effects on growth etc when inserted into nuclear genome. Worthy of addition, under "Biotech. Apps", or perhaps a simple mention? Geno-Supremo ( talk) 20:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
This article talk page was automatically added with {{ WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot ( talk) 18:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Although it seems weird for the article to mention hayashibara in the lede and then not mention anything about it elsewhere, here's some (English language) references to Hayashibara's work on the stuff: [1] [2] -- moof ( talk) 08:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
I still don't know if trehalose is good fom me the consumer> Is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.35.162.89 ( talk) 20:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
There is evidence of trehalose intolerance, similar in symptoms to lactose intolerance. See http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11941647 and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10522609 . Perhaps it should be mentioned also here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.250.234.56 ( talk) 15:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
there is evidence in an article in the LA Times that C diff thrives on this carb http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-sugar-c-diff-20180103-story.html http://richardsprague.com/microbiome/2017/01/31/c-difficile-and-trehalose.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.140.201.66 ( talk) 05:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Fascinating article in Nature which someone listed and someone else reverted
This is a rather hot development, need to flag this article as a developing topic. I don't think this can be ignored by Wikipedia any more than an outbreak of Ebola. Keith Henson ( talk) 04:09, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
The study’s findings raise several avenues for future research. For instance, the connection between trehalose metabolism and toxin production, and how this is linked to increased death rates in people infected with RT027, will require further analysis. Whether trehalose in the human colon, where disease occurs, reaches high enough levels to affect RT027 and RT078 virulence is also unknown. The authors tested fluid from the small intestine, thus bypassing the colon, where the complex complement of gut microbes might break down trehalose.
If this is not a good medical secondary source, then there are other medical articles that should have a reference to this source cleaned out. Keith Henson ( talk) 20:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Opening para is way too technical. Tell me in plain English what this stuff is. 173.90.65.191 ( talk) 04:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
I don't mind; I'd just like to understand. RussellBell ( talk) 06:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Any information as to whether or not this substance causes a glycemic response (spikes your blood sugar) like sucrose, or if it attenuates this response? 0-0-0-Destruct-0 03:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I came to this page having eaten a snack product and read ingredients. I want to know about GI and if there were any other interactions. I had already guessed trehalose might be like maltose - hadn't remembered the term disaccharide at first, just knew maltose was rumoured to have higher gi than glucose due to delivering two glucose molecules at a time. The article mentions sweetness - but how is this connected to GI if at all? I also wondered about any evidence of other health risks - thinking of the heard-of mooting of diabetes-incidence risks of high fructose consumption. Mention here of water-holding properties made me think of glycerine - pregnant women and diabetics are advised caution with that. Not that I am diabetic.So who going to find the info and put it in? I think over all this article is written for undegraduate biochemists and commercial scientists, rather than the interested consumer. Can we do both? We're meant to avoid too much unexplained jargon, aren't we? (feel free to seperate those few last points into a new section - limited time here now). Kathybramley ( talk) 11:27, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Xerobiosis, Is this a real term? Googling it only brings forth two results, both of them mentioned in Wikipedia entries.-- Hooperbloob 03:17, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Added a bit of text based on my own memories of working with the stuff. GDL 1 Feb 2005
Can we get this molecule in the haworth projection? Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 139.62.210.57 ( talk)
Hi, I think the Haworth projection is incorrect. The 2nd sugar should be a-D-glucose but the stereochemistry is inverted. I'll see if I can fix it later unless someone else does it first. I'm not sure what the formating is though. See http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iupac/2carb/36.html for an image of trehalos —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.32.50.98 ( talk) 00:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
The gene for trehalose synthesis was inserted into plants (both chloroplast and nuclear engineering) to investigate use in drought resistance. Rather successful, though it had some effects on growth etc when inserted into nuclear genome. Worthy of addition, under "Biotech. Apps", or perhaps a simple mention? Geno-Supremo ( talk) 20:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
This article talk page was automatically added with {{ WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot ( talk) 18:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Although it seems weird for the article to mention hayashibara in the lede and then not mention anything about it elsewhere, here's some (English language) references to Hayashibara's work on the stuff: [1] [2] -- moof ( talk) 08:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
I still don't know if trehalose is good fom me the consumer> Is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.35.162.89 ( talk) 20:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
There is evidence of trehalose intolerance, similar in symptoms to lactose intolerance. See http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11941647 and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10522609 . Perhaps it should be mentioned also here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.250.234.56 ( talk) 15:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
there is evidence in an article in the LA Times that C diff thrives on this carb http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-sugar-c-diff-20180103-story.html http://richardsprague.com/microbiome/2017/01/31/c-difficile-and-trehalose.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.140.201.66 ( talk) 05:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Fascinating article in Nature which someone listed and someone else reverted
This is a rather hot development, need to flag this article as a developing topic. I don't think this can be ignored by Wikipedia any more than an outbreak of Ebola. Keith Henson ( talk) 04:09, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
The study’s findings raise several avenues for future research. For instance, the connection between trehalose metabolism and toxin production, and how this is linked to increased death rates in people infected with RT027, will require further analysis. Whether trehalose in the human colon, where disease occurs, reaches high enough levels to affect RT027 and RT078 virulence is also unknown. The authors tested fluid from the small intestine, thus bypassing the colon, where the complex complement of gut microbes might break down trehalose.
If this is not a good medical secondary source, then there are other medical articles that should have a reference to this source cleaned out. Keith Henson ( talk) 20:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Opening para is way too technical. Tell me in plain English what this stuff is. 173.90.65.191 ( talk) 04:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
I don't mind; I'd just like to understand. RussellBell ( talk) 06:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)