 | The contents of the Transformativeness page were merged into Transformation (law) on 7 December 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
 | Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
This article seems to be a copy of Derivative_works#Transformativeness. The Derivative_works section should be synopsized into a sparse wiki structure, and this article extended so that work isn't duplicated.-- John Bessa ( talk) 13:43, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Well, that's an ironic comment. Are you saying this article itself isn't sufficently transformative? Robofish ( talk) 11:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Not to mention Transformation (law). It should probably all be merged to one location, but which? — Geoff Capp ( talk) 00:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Transformativeness and Transformation (law) should be merged and Derivative work#Transformativeness made a WP:SUMMARY of the merged article. The patent sense can either be included in the merged article or, if the merged article is to be copyright-law specific, add a hatnote to United States patent law. jnestorius( talk) 17:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Jnestorius, I agree. Onceinawhile ( talk) 13:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Transformation (law) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 10:35, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
| The contents of the Transformativeness page were merged into Transformation (law) on 7 December 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
This article seems to be a copy of Derivative_works#Transformativeness. The Derivative_works section should be synopsized into a sparse wiki structure, and this article extended so that work isn't duplicated.-- John Bessa ( talk) 13:43, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Well, that's an ironic comment. Are you saying this article itself isn't sufficently transformative? Robofish ( talk) 11:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Not to mention Transformation (law). It should probably all be merged to one location, but which? — Geoff Capp ( talk) 00:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Transformativeness and Transformation (law) should be merged and Derivative work#Transformativeness made a WP:SUMMARY of the merged article. The patent sense can either be included in the merged article or, if the merged article is to be copyright-law specific, add a hatnote to United States patent law. jnestorius( talk) 17:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Jnestorius, I agree. Onceinawhile ( talk) 13:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Transformation (law) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 10:35, 14 July 2021 (UTC)