From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

TM as an organization, not a movement

TM can certainly be seen as a “movement”, and was so for its more formative years, but even during the early decades it functioned as a specific organization with its own trademarks, properties, leadership hierarchy, etc.

Should this article reflect that instead of framing it all as a movement? Or should there be a new article for the TM organization? Bagabondo ( talk) 02:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

TM as an organization, not a movement

TM can certainly be seen as a “movement”, and was so for its more formative years, but even during the early decades it functioned as a specific organization with its own trademarks, properties, leadership hierarchy, etc.

Should this article reflect that instead of framing it all as a movement? Or should there be a new article for the TM organization? Bagabondo ( talk) 02:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook