 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Showing now in legitimate mainstream cinemas in Thailand. 110.171.124.85 ( talk) 22:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. wbm1058 ( talk) 19:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Tracers (film) →
Tracers – There is no other page titled Tracers.
MyNameIsASDF (
talk)
22:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Strong oppose not the primary topic. Clearly the ammunition is the primary topic of "tracers" -- 70.51.46.39 ( talk) 00:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Strong oppose there is no primary topic, also please @ MyNameIsASDF: "There is no other page titled..." is first not true - the current Tracers is a page, just not an article, it is a redirect to the dab, and second such an argument irrelevant for titling purposes, please see WP:TITLE and WP:DISAMBIGUATION, and hurricane for an example. In ictu oculi ( talk) 08:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Strong oppose per In ictu oculi. The nominator should take the some time to study WP:TITLE and WP:DISAMBIGUATION before making time-wasting, ill-founded proposals such as this one. Hint: the question of whether there is another article with the title "Tracers" is irrelevant. The test is to what the word "tracers" most commonly refers ... and the answer to that is very clear not the film. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 16:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Showing now in legitimate mainstream cinemas in Thailand. 110.171.124.85 ( talk) 22:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. wbm1058 ( talk) 19:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Tracers (film) →
Tracers – There is no other page titled Tracers.
MyNameIsASDF (
talk)
22:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Strong oppose not the primary topic. Clearly the ammunition is the primary topic of "tracers" -- 70.51.46.39 ( talk) 00:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Strong oppose there is no primary topic, also please @ MyNameIsASDF: "There is no other page titled..." is first not true - the current Tracers is a page, just not an article, it is a redirect to the dab, and second such an argument irrelevant for titling purposes, please see WP:TITLE and WP:DISAMBIGUATION, and hurricane for an example. In ictu oculi ( talk) 08:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Strong oppose per In ictu oculi. The nominator should take the some time to study WP:TITLE and WP:DISAMBIGUATION before making time-wasting, ill-founded proposals such as this one. Hint: the question of whether there is another article with the title "Tracers" is irrelevant. The test is to what the word "tracers" most commonly refers ... and the answer to that is very clear not the film. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 16:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.