A fact from Toxic Beauty appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 4 May 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: The article should be divided into sections. There are no categories at the moment. Also, add a reception section. There are seven reviews at Rotten Tomatoes. You have cited IMDB as a source, note that it isn't a reliable source. Also, there is an infobox for films. The external link is dead. this source is a good one if you want to expand the article. You have nominated the article for DYK, I have fixed all the errors it caused. Note that the ALT1 is kind of misleading hook. Thanks for creating the article..
~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk 13:11, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk)
19:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Created by RTG ( talk). Self-nominated at 12:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC).
would be happy to review this (if Medusa isn't) but first obvious problem is the orphan tag Kingoflettuce ( talk) 14:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Quite unorthodox to place a generic makeup picture in the infobox rather than the poster, I think. Kingoflettuce ( talk) 09:20, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Unlike Goop, IMDb is on the list, so something has to be done about that too.. Kingoflettuce ( talk) 09:20, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Ok all seems set now Earwig found no likely copyvio, new and long enough, an interesting hook, article is fairly neutrally-worded. Cheers! Kingoflettuce ( talk) 15:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
... that according to the documentary Toxic Beauty? Thanks, Yoninah ( talk) 17:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The film interviews doctors, lawyers, and scientists, explores how products are made, and compares a recent surge in litigation against Johnson & Johnson to decades of public pressure for reforms against the tobacco industry in the 1960s with claims that tens of thousands of dangerous chemicals are unregulated in popular cosmetic products in the USA without adequate regulation such as an appropriate warning on the label, even when toxic substances have been identified in products as far back as the 60s as legislation has not had a relevant change since the 1930s in favor of a "postmarket regulatory system", even though the act has been updated to cover similar issues in food and drugs.
clear NPOV violations:
Therapyisgood ( talk) 19:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
A fact from Toxic Beauty appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 4 May 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: The article should be divided into sections. There are no categories at the moment. Also, add a reception section. There are seven reviews at Rotten Tomatoes. You have cited IMDB as a source, note that it isn't a reliable source. Also, there is an infobox for films. The external link is dead. this source is a good one if you want to expand the article. You have nominated the article for DYK, I have fixed all the errors it caused. Note that the ALT1 is kind of misleading hook. Thanks for creating the article..
~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk 13:11, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk)
19:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Created by RTG ( talk). Self-nominated at 12:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC).
would be happy to review this (if Medusa isn't) but first obvious problem is the orphan tag Kingoflettuce ( talk) 14:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Quite unorthodox to place a generic makeup picture in the infobox rather than the poster, I think. Kingoflettuce ( talk) 09:20, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Unlike Goop, IMDb is on the list, so something has to be done about that too.. Kingoflettuce ( talk) 09:20, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Ok all seems set now Earwig found no likely copyvio, new and long enough, an interesting hook, article is fairly neutrally-worded. Cheers! Kingoflettuce ( talk) 15:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
... that according to the documentary Toxic Beauty? Thanks, Yoninah ( talk) 17:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The film interviews doctors, lawyers, and scientists, explores how products are made, and compares a recent surge in litigation against Johnson & Johnson to decades of public pressure for reforms against the tobacco industry in the 1960s with claims that tens of thousands of dangerous chemicals are unregulated in popular cosmetic products in the USA without adequate regulation such as an appropriate warning on the label, even when toxic substances have been identified in products as far back as the 60s as legislation has not had a relevant change since the 1930s in favor of a "postmarket regulatory system", even though the act has been updated to cover similar issues in food and drugs.
clear NPOV violations:
Therapyisgood ( talk) 19:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)