 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about TorqueFlites, transmissions, or related matters. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about TorqueFlites, transmissions, or related matters at the Reference desk. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Dana60Cummins, in this edit you added material related to TorqueFlite designation that does not, in my search, seem supportable. I cannot find evidence to support the assertion that TorqueFlites with e control designations necessarily used electronic control for the TCC and overdrive, but used hydromechanical control of the first three gears. That may be the case with e.g. the 42RE (renamed A998), but not with the 41TE (A604), which is fully electronic. Likewise, I find no material referring to a fe control designation used to designate "fully electronic" TorqueFlites. Do you have a reliable source for the fe assertion? — Scheinwerfermann T· C 00:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- No source, just experience. 41TE may be different from the 42/44/46 and 47 RE's. But those transmissions have the torque converter clutch controlled electronically, as well as overdrive. RH's are the same. I got wiring diagrams to prove this. -- Dana60Cummins ( talk) 00:04, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- The only difference notable between the RH's and RE's in the 46/47 types is the fact one is controlled hydromechanical and the other electronically controlled.-- Dana60Cummins ( talk) 01:07, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Anyway, incredibly, the 41TE is NOT shown in the list...! Amclaussen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.100.180.19 ( talk) 14:48, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. EdJohnston ( talk) 16:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
TorqueFlite →
Chrysler TorqueFlite transmission – I propose the move to help disambiguate between the Chrysler designed TorqueFlite transmissions and the ZF designed "Torqueflite 8" transmissions
VX1NG (
talk)
13:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:TWODABS and WP:PRIMARY. A disambiguation page is not needed if there are only two topics, and one can be considered primary; this is resolved by doing the disambiguation in a hatnote, which Torqueflite already has. The ZF article, ZF 8HP transmission, fails WP:DABMENTION as it doesn't even mention TorqueFlite anywhere in the article, much less in the title, and there is no evidence at all that the longstanding TorqueFlite article is not the primary use of the term. bd2412 T 17:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
| This page is not a forum for general discussion about TorqueFlites, transmissions, or related matters. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about TorqueFlites, transmissions, or related matters at the Reference desk. |
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dana60Cummins, in this edit you added material related to TorqueFlite designation that does not, in my search, seem supportable. I cannot find evidence to support the assertion that TorqueFlites with e control designations necessarily used electronic control for the TCC and overdrive, but used hydromechanical control of the first three gears. That may be the case with e.g. the 42RE (renamed A998), but not with the 41TE (A604), which is fully electronic. Likewise, I find no material referring to a fe control designation used to designate "fully electronic" TorqueFlites. Do you have a reliable source for the fe assertion? — Scheinwerfermann T· C 00:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- No source, just experience. 41TE may be different from the 42/44/46 and 47 RE's. But those transmissions have the torque converter clutch controlled electronically, as well as overdrive. RH's are the same. I got wiring diagrams to prove this. -- Dana60Cummins ( talk) 00:04, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- The only difference notable between the RH's and RE's in the 46/47 types is the fact one is controlled hydromechanical and the other electronically controlled.-- Dana60Cummins ( talk) 01:07, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Anyway, incredibly, the 41TE is NOT shown in the list...! Amclaussen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.100.180.19 ( talk) 14:48, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. EdJohnston ( talk) 16:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
TorqueFlite →
Chrysler TorqueFlite transmission – I propose the move to help disambiguate between the Chrysler designed TorqueFlite transmissions and the ZF designed "Torqueflite 8" transmissions
VX1NG (
talk)
13:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:TWODABS and WP:PRIMARY. A disambiguation page is not needed if there are only two topics, and one can be considered primary; this is resolved by doing the disambiguation in a hatnote, which Torqueflite already has. The ZF article, ZF 8HP transmission, fails WP:DABMENTION as it doesn't even mention TorqueFlite anywhere in the article, much less in the title, and there is no evidence at all that the longstanding TorqueFlite article is not the primary use of the term. bd2412 T 17:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.