![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is no proof that Kurt Russel ghost directed this film. No one has backed up his claim, not one person. The real director is dead, and in my opinion this is tantamount to defaming the dead, and has no place on Wikipedia. If this claim is true, then it should be easy to prove it. But not one agrees with Russel that he directed the film "from the sidelines." Perhaps his claim is true, but until a reference can be provided, this claim, while interesting, does not belong it the articles introduction. Considered one of the greatest westerns ever made, it's distasteful to imply that someone else directed your film; the director is dead and can't defend himself. Find a reference backing up this claim, other than Russel himself. -- Nikoz78 ( talk) 16:11, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
I've read the Russell interview and my feeling is that Kurt confused the duties of a director and a producer; what he claimed to do is, essentially, a producer's job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.78.200.48 ( talk) 18:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Source not found. " http://www.truewestmagazine.com/jcontent/entertainment/entertainment/western-movies/2787-the-western-godfather" link goes to "We are sorry. But the page you are looking for cannot be found." 70.171.111.130 ( talk) 06:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
A dispute has arisen over the addition of an internal link to the non-existent article Peter Sherayko. Put simply, the redlink should exist per WP:REDLINK to "serve as a clear indication of which articles are in need of creation, and encourage it." - two other articles already redlink to Peter Sherayko who is demonstrably an actor who has appeared in several prominent productions and may warrant a biographical article in the future. Per the policy: "Do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject."
Thus far, I have been repeatedly reverted with no attempt to engage in discussion and no rationale other than dubious reasoning, you are the one who needs to give a reason and Per BRD, it is your obligation to explain your edits on the talk page, not mine.
As part of this dispute, I've been threatened with being blocked for vandalism by TheOldJacobite, an individual who has been blocked several times for edit-warring, and threatened with being blocked for edit-warring by Doniago, an individual who "is not an admin but would like to be some day". I have also now read WP:BRD and know it is an essay not a policy and does not give an editor carte blanche to impose his favoured page revision with no reference to policies or guidelines.
I would also recommend that TheOldJacobite and Doniago exercise some common-sense and refrain from tossing out warning and threats to individuals who obviously do not have a fixed IP address - if I actually was the vandal which they have treated me like then I would be merrily trolling away while they were still trying to block an IP which had been abandoned days before. 79.72.143.90 ( talk) 06:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
I've now requested protection for this article, as another IP re-inserted the redlink. This should not be done without consensus. I'd very much like to believe that that IP is not the same one listed above, editing in bad faith. DonIago ( talk) 16:26, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Tombstone (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is no proof that Kurt Russel ghost directed this film. No one has backed up his claim, not one person. The real director is dead, and in my opinion this is tantamount to defaming the dead, and has no place on Wikipedia. If this claim is true, then it should be easy to prove it. But not one agrees with Russel that he directed the film "from the sidelines." Perhaps his claim is true, but until a reference can be provided, this claim, while interesting, does not belong it the articles introduction. Considered one of the greatest westerns ever made, it's distasteful to imply that someone else directed your film; the director is dead and can't defend himself. Find a reference backing up this claim, other than Russel himself. -- Nikoz78 ( talk) 16:11, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
I've read the Russell interview and my feeling is that Kurt confused the duties of a director and a producer; what he claimed to do is, essentially, a producer's job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.78.200.48 ( talk) 18:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Source not found. " http://www.truewestmagazine.com/jcontent/entertainment/entertainment/western-movies/2787-the-western-godfather" link goes to "We are sorry. But the page you are looking for cannot be found." 70.171.111.130 ( talk) 06:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
A dispute has arisen over the addition of an internal link to the non-existent article Peter Sherayko. Put simply, the redlink should exist per WP:REDLINK to "serve as a clear indication of which articles are in need of creation, and encourage it." - two other articles already redlink to Peter Sherayko who is demonstrably an actor who has appeared in several prominent productions and may warrant a biographical article in the future. Per the policy: "Do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject."
Thus far, I have been repeatedly reverted with no attempt to engage in discussion and no rationale other than dubious reasoning, you are the one who needs to give a reason and Per BRD, it is your obligation to explain your edits on the talk page, not mine.
As part of this dispute, I've been threatened with being blocked for vandalism by TheOldJacobite, an individual who has been blocked several times for edit-warring, and threatened with being blocked for edit-warring by Doniago, an individual who "is not an admin but would like to be some day". I have also now read WP:BRD and know it is an essay not a policy and does not give an editor carte blanche to impose his favoured page revision with no reference to policies or guidelines.
I would also recommend that TheOldJacobite and Doniago exercise some common-sense and refrain from tossing out warning and threats to individuals who obviously do not have a fixed IP address - if I actually was the vandal which they have treated me like then I would be merrily trolling away while they were still trying to block an IP which had been abandoned days before. 79.72.143.90 ( talk) 06:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
I've now requested protection for this article, as another IP re-inserted the redlink. This should not be done without consensus. I'd very much like to believe that that IP is not the same one listed above, editing in bad faith. DonIago ( talk) 16:26, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Tombstone (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)