![]() | Tom Wilson (ice hockey) has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 8, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tom Wilson (ice hockey) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the word "disgusting human being...." to "an aggressive, effective, and sometimes controversial Hocky player" Davidsalzberg ( talk) 19:34, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
For whenever the page is unprotected or for someone who has access to edit, here is sourcing for his most recent suspension here, and the header should be changed to say "five occasions" now. Mumblecores ( talk) 19:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
To enforcer (ice hockey) or unlock the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.11.228.27 ( talk) 04:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove "Immediately following the altercation with Buchnevich, Wilson attacked Rangers forward Artemi Panarin, thwarting him to the ice. The following day, the NHL announced that there would be no suspension for Wilson' attack on Panarin, which resulted in a backlash from around the NHL as well as the Rangers"
This section is for fines and suspensions, not for actions that should have received supplemental discipline. Ronmanning86 ( talk) 05:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. This seems to be relevant being that it was immediately after another event he was fined for. —
IVORK
Talk 06:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)There's no discussion of other scrums that occurred near the time of other events in the list, despite most of them having after-event scrums. I'll submit another edit request to change the existing text to be from a neutral point of view- in accordance with the five pillars Ronmanning86 ( talk) 16:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "Immediately following the altercation with Buchnevich, Wilson attacked Rangers forward Artemi Panarin, thwarting him to the ice. The following day, the NHL announced that there would be no suspension for Wilson' attack on Panarin, which resulted in a backlash from around the NHL as well as the Rangers." to "Immediately following the incident with Buchnevich, Rangers forward Artemi Panarin engaged Wilson in the scrum, which resulted in Wilson throwing Panarin to the ice. The following day, the NHL announced that there would be no supplemental discipline for the altercation with Panarin, which incited backlash from around the NHL as well as the Rangers' management who were fined $250,000 for disparaging remarks regarding the NHL Department of Player Safety."
This edit is more in line with the five pillars, describing what happened from a neutral point of view. (and it fixes some minor typos) Ronmanning86 ( talk) 16:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski ( talk · contribs) 13:32, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for
GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
![]() | Tom Wilson (ice hockey) has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 8, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tom Wilson (ice hockey) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the word "disgusting human being...." to "an aggressive, effective, and sometimes controversial Hocky player" Davidsalzberg ( talk) 19:34, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
For whenever the page is unprotected or for someone who has access to edit, here is sourcing for his most recent suspension here, and the header should be changed to say "five occasions" now. Mumblecores ( talk) 19:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
To enforcer (ice hockey) or unlock the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.11.228.27 ( talk) 04:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove "Immediately following the altercation with Buchnevich, Wilson attacked Rangers forward Artemi Panarin, thwarting him to the ice. The following day, the NHL announced that there would be no suspension for Wilson' attack on Panarin, which resulted in a backlash from around the NHL as well as the Rangers"
This section is for fines and suspensions, not for actions that should have received supplemental discipline. Ronmanning86 ( talk) 05:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. This seems to be relevant being that it was immediately after another event he was fined for. —
IVORK
Talk 06:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)There's no discussion of other scrums that occurred near the time of other events in the list, despite most of them having after-event scrums. I'll submit another edit request to change the existing text to be from a neutral point of view- in accordance with the five pillars Ronmanning86 ( talk) 16:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "Immediately following the altercation with Buchnevich, Wilson attacked Rangers forward Artemi Panarin, thwarting him to the ice. The following day, the NHL announced that there would be no suspension for Wilson' attack on Panarin, which resulted in a backlash from around the NHL as well as the Rangers." to "Immediately following the incident with Buchnevich, Rangers forward Artemi Panarin engaged Wilson in the scrum, which resulted in Wilson throwing Panarin to the ice. The following day, the NHL announced that there would be no supplemental discipline for the altercation with Panarin, which incited backlash from around the NHL as well as the Rangers' management who were fined $250,000 for disparaging remarks regarding the NHL Department of Player Safety."
This edit is more in line with the five pillars, describing what happened from a neutral point of view. (and it fixes some minor typos) Ronmanning86 ( talk) 16:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski ( talk · contribs) 13:32, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for
GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.