This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is it correct to say that the Sisters of Perpetual indulgence "mock" the Catholic Church, rather than "are critical of" the Church? I think "mock" fits their activity very well. Why pussyfoot around? Griot 06:46, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
How about we split the difference between "mock" and "critical" and just use "parody" as the term?
On a side note, if you do revert edits, could you make sure you don't revert grammatical and spelling mistakes at the same time? SimonBillenness 01:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Parody's okay. Side note? Griot 07:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
(Redacted)
The above content, although probably true, was removed for copyright violation. Consider reworking and rewording anything appropriate back into the article. Banjeboi 00:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the page says Ammiano was muttering ”Kiss my gay ass”, whereas in videos such as http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyVLwRvA9BE he can be clearly heard shouting ”Kiss my faggot ass”. Now, Ammiano’s official version is that he said ”gay” and it seems US political decorum requires that everyone respect this ... even when we can all see for ourselves that it’s not true. I suppose no ”reputable source” will report the real wording, so we can’t report it on Wikipedia either, as it would be ”original research”. So are we stuck with reporting a factual error, even though we all know it’s a factual error?
What is the best section title for the section concerning Schwarzenegger's veto message which acrostically says "I Fuck You"?
Comments previously is that "I Fuck You" is vulgar. Wikipedia doesn't censor. The issue was the message "I Fuck You" rather than the memo itself. And that controversy is a word we try to avoid and isn't appropriate here.
Any help appreciated to come to the best decision. -- Banjeboi 20:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is it correct to say that the Sisters of Perpetual indulgence "mock" the Catholic Church, rather than "are critical of" the Church? I think "mock" fits their activity very well. Why pussyfoot around? Griot 06:46, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
How about we split the difference between "mock" and "critical" and just use "parody" as the term?
On a side note, if you do revert edits, could you make sure you don't revert grammatical and spelling mistakes at the same time? SimonBillenness 01:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Parody's okay. Side note? Griot 07:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
(Redacted)
The above content, although probably true, was removed for copyright violation. Consider reworking and rewording anything appropriate back into the article. Banjeboi 00:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the page says Ammiano was muttering ”Kiss my gay ass”, whereas in videos such as http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyVLwRvA9BE he can be clearly heard shouting ”Kiss my faggot ass”. Now, Ammiano’s official version is that he said ”gay” and it seems US political decorum requires that everyone respect this ... even when we can all see for ourselves that it’s not true. I suppose no ”reputable source” will report the real wording, so we can’t report it on Wikipedia either, as it would be ”original research”. So are we stuck with reporting a factual error, even though we all know it’s a factual error?
What is the best section title for the section concerning Schwarzenegger's veto message which acrostically says "I Fuck You"?
Comments previously is that "I Fuck You" is vulgar. Wikipedia doesn't censor. The issue was the message "I Fuck You" rather than the memo itself. And that controversy is a word we try to avoid and isn't appropriate here.
Any help appreciated to come to the best decision. -- Banjeboi 20:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)