This is the
talk page for discussing
To The Stars Inc. and anything related to its purposes and tasks. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ ජපස: you have reverted a first edit [1] citing WP:GEVAL. I reverted and asked for explanation [2]. None was provided. Instead you removed those additions again and others just citing WP:NPOV [3]. I disagree with your assessment and have reverted once more [4]. Please explain what POV is being pushed here. Those are two main edits. Please reply below in line. Thanks -- Gtoffoletto ( talk) 19:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
EDIT 1: descriptions of the company by the Washington Post and others: It's been described as a "media and scientific research company"
[5] and is best known for releasing widely publicized Navy fighter jet cockpit videos.
[6]
EDIT 2: a comment by Richard M. Dolan which you descried as "a credulous ufologist known for whining about the real world not taking his alien woo seriously" but no source was provided (none available on his Wiki article).
I don't care what VICE...You should. I'm sure you are aware that WP:RS
Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are coveredand not your own beliefs or evaluations in order to promote your POV. You can't pick and choose the sources you like. -- Gtoffoletto ( talk) 13:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
[8] the order of sections. Really? -- Gtoffoletto ( talk) 13:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
@ 5Q5:. But is there a guideline on where the list of works should go?
CURRENTLY:
MY PROPOSAL is:
This way the list doesn't impede legibility of the article but is at the end for reference. The articles I have linked above (I just looked for generic independent producers) seem to use this standard (list at the end.) -- Gtoffoletto ( talk) 17:33, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
See above. This is a fringe company and the lead doesn't say anything about UFOs, etc. Doug Weller talk 14:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing
To The Stars Inc. and anything related to its purposes and tasks. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ ජපස: you have reverted a first edit [1] citing WP:GEVAL. I reverted and asked for explanation [2]. None was provided. Instead you removed those additions again and others just citing WP:NPOV [3]. I disagree with your assessment and have reverted once more [4]. Please explain what POV is being pushed here. Those are two main edits. Please reply below in line. Thanks -- Gtoffoletto ( talk) 19:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
EDIT 1: descriptions of the company by the Washington Post and others: It's been described as a "media and scientific research company"
[5] and is best known for releasing widely publicized Navy fighter jet cockpit videos.
[6]
EDIT 2: a comment by Richard M. Dolan which you descried as "a credulous ufologist known for whining about the real world not taking his alien woo seriously" but no source was provided (none available on his Wiki article).
I don't care what VICE...You should. I'm sure you are aware that WP:RS
Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are coveredand not your own beliefs or evaluations in order to promote your POV. You can't pick and choose the sources you like. -- Gtoffoletto ( talk) 13:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
[8] the order of sections. Really? -- Gtoffoletto ( talk) 13:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
@ 5Q5:. But is there a guideline on where the list of works should go?
CURRENTLY:
MY PROPOSAL is:
This way the list doesn't impede legibility of the article but is at the end for reference. The articles I have linked above (I just looked for generic independent producers) seem to use this standard (list at the end.) -- Gtoffoletto ( talk) 17:33, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
See above. This is a fringe company and the lead doesn't say anything about UFOs, etc. Doug Weller talk 14:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)