This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Evangelical Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Evangelical Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Evangelical Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Evangelical ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityEvangelical Christianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Film: Christian / American Start‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. This article is supported by the Christian films task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Does the plot section to anyone else seem like an advertisement for the movie? -- Tyler John ( talk) 15:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC) reply

I would not say advertisement. The last line especially. "he eventually saves the life of some other suicidal kid". I do fond that section especially wanting. I have not seen the movie, but my understanding from my friend's experiences with it is that there is much more to this plot. This summary makes i sound quite shallow, something that I am not sure it is. 75.69.129.253 ( talk) 20:43, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply

This movie contains no blood at all It's everything but disturbing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.129.5.186 ( talk) 13:54, 25 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I've reverted your deletion of this because it comes directly from the MPAA explanation of rating of the movie. Just because someone doesn't agree with it doesn't mean that it can just be deleted. 71.117.236.129 ( talk) 10:11, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on To Save a Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091230035027/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/content_display/film/news/e3icf13d4806aba58dee5dfd41fc4d48d56 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3icf13d4806aba58dee5dfd41fc4d48d56

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Half a million or "about a million"? - Both figures are quoted in the article (in different places). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuel Marks ( talk • contribs) 10:49, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Something I've noticed in this article is how many positive critical reviews there are in contrast to negative ones. Can somebody please try to balance them out?

-- Neateditor123 ( talk) 16:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123 reply