This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
Which template to use?
This is NOT an article:
First line is a definition, and it is already in
Wiktionary.
The next part is in the article
Little Tich, which already has a good ref, decent external links and formatting. If Little Tich can be proven to be the origin of 'titch = small boy/small amount', that fact could be added to the Little Tich article. By itself, such a definition seems to me to fail in notability.
"titch = ballboy" is unverifiable by online dictionaries (given that ballboys are boys, and therefore small, this might be regional slang - but with nothing cited, there is no proof they are called 'titch'). Even if it was verifiable, it would still belong in Wiktionary.
"titch = small amount" is covered in the Wiktionary entry.
That makes two (possibly three) dictionary definitions, and one section that is a duplicate of a fuller article. One wonders if a Template:Unreferenced should be put up, or if it should go straight to the AfD process.
Elanna-Rose21:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)reply
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
Which template to use?
This is NOT an article:
First line is a definition, and it is already in
Wiktionary.
The next part is in the article
Little Tich, which already has a good ref, decent external links and formatting. If Little Tich can be proven to be the origin of 'titch = small boy/small amount', that fact could be added to the Little Tich article. By itself, such a definition seems to me to fail in notability.
"titch = ballboy" is unverifiable by online dictionaries (given that ballboys are boys, and therefore small, this might be regional slang - but with nothing cited, there is no proof they are called 'titch'). Even if it was verifiable, it would still belong in Wiktionary.
"titch = small amount" is covered in the Wiktionary entry.
That makes two (possibly three) dictionary definitions, and one section that is a duplicate of a fuller article. One wonders if a Template:Unreferenced should be put up, or if it should go straight to the AfD process.
Elanna-Rose21:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)reply