This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The passenger underpass for the shuttle is above the downtown local track of the BMT Broadway line and not between the two express tracks as was originally noted in the article. I ride this section of the BMT every day and can attest to this.
The downtown local track dips down right after the 49th Street station so that it can go underneath the underpass and rejoins the other 3 tracks just before it gets to the Times Square station.
-- Allan 18:24, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
Is there aany way to get rid of that terri\bly ugly white space just below the 1st paragraph? Can someone make the info box not push the text all down and have it just wrap the text? It looks really dumb as it is right now. Justin Tokke ( talk) 18:15, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I don't like the look of the external links section. Too many links, and I'm not sure how many are relevant. I deleted one definite linkspam (crossposted to multiple pages) and moved the street views to their own section. Perhaps it's possible to weed out a few more, or maybe collapse them with a show/hide template? Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 19:37, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
The next stop south for the IRT Flushing Line's services is listed as 34th Street, which is under construction. The 10th Avenue station should also be listed a planned station. Otherwise, the 96th Street (IND Second Avenue Line) station on the IND Second Avenue Line should not have links for 106th Street, either, because 106th Street station is not funded and not under construction, like 10th Avenue. Epicgenius( talk to me • see my contributions) 13:15, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
"all except 42nd Street Shuttle; passageway between 42nd Street – Port Authority Bus Terminal and rest of complex is not accessible" - Eh? Could this tangled verbiage be decoded into something more, umm, accessible? Jim.henderson ( talk) 18:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:South Ferry – Whitehall Street (New York City Subway) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 04:14, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:163rd Street–Amsterdam Avenue (IND Eighth Avenue Line) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 18:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Times Square–42nd Street/Port Authority Bus Terminal (New York City Subway). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:36, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Mgasparin: This is nowhere near ready for it.
@ Mgasparin: If you need advice on how to improve the article, don't hesitate to ask me other editors. We could always use more help on the topic. Thanks.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 16:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
@ Mtattrain: I found a diagram showing the station complex with the opening of the Flushing Line station, which shows some building exits I don't think we have mentioned, and notes the closure of the Knickerbocker entrance. Could you help me reconcile this and this so we could add information to the article? Thanks.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 16:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Can someone look at possibly fixing the VERY long space between the lead and the first section? It is distracting and not appealing. I suppose an alternative would be to merge the rest of the article into the infobox, which is colorful but seems to have grown to dwarf the article. It seems WP:What Wikipedia is not might be considered. -- Otr500 ( talk) 21:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
@ Epicgenius: I am pretty sure the platforms here on the IND are 660 feet-E trains did run here with 11-car trains briefly in the 1950s. As an aside, we should add info about the MTA's planned redevelopment of the storefront space on the mezzanine level announced at an MTA board meeting in the fall.
The biggest hole in the article is the construction/planning for the BMT station, and the changes made to fit in the Dual Contracts IRT station. Your work on this article has been exceptional. There is also more to add on the late 80s/early 90s proposed station renovation, among other things. Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 19:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The passenger underpass for the shuttle is above the downtown local track of the BMT Broadway line and not between the two express tracks as was originally noted in the article. I ride this section of the BMT every day and can attest to this.
The downtown local track dips down right after the 49th Street station so that it can go underneath the underpass and rejoins the other 3 tracks just before it gets to the Times Square station.
-- Allan 18:24, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
Is there aany way to get rid of that terri\bly ugly white space just below the 1st paragraph? Can someone make the info box not push the text all down and have it just wrap the text? It looks really dumb as it is right now. Justin Tokke ( talk) 18:15, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I don't like the look of the external links section. Too many links, and I'm not sure how many are relevant. I deleted one definite linkspam (crossposted to multiple pages) and moved the street views to their own section. Perhaps it's possible to weed out a few more, or maybe collapse them with a show/hide template? Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 19:37, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
The next stop south for the IRT Flushing Line's services is listed as 34th Street, which is under construction. The 10th Avenue station should also be listed a planned station. Otherwise, the 96th Street (IND Second Avenue Line) station on the IND Second Avenue Line should not have links for 106th Street, either, because 106th Street station is not funded and not under construction, like 10th Avenue. Epicgenius( talk to me • see my contributions) 13:15, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
"all except 42nd Street Shuttle; passageway between 42nd Street – Port Authority Bus Terminal and rest of complex is not accessible" - Eh? Could this tangled verbiage be decoded into something more, umm, accessible? Jim.henderson ( talk) 18:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:South Ferry – Whitehall Street (New York City Subway) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 04:14, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:163rd Street–Amsterdam Avenue (IND Eighth Avenue Line) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 18:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Times Square–42nd Street/Port Authority Bus Terminal (New York City Subway). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:36, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Mgasparin: This is nowhere near ready for it.
@ Mgasparin: If you need advice on how to improve the article, don't hesitate to ask me other editors. We could always use more help on the topic. Thanks.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 16:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
@ Mtattrain: I found a diagram showing the station complex with the opening of the Flushing Line station, which shows some building exits I don't think we have mentioned, and notes the closure of the Knickerbocker entrance. Could you help me reconcile this and this so we could add information to the article? Thanks.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 16:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Can someone look at possibly fixing the VERY long space between the lead and the first section? It is distracting and not appealing. I suppose an alternative would be to merge the rest of the article into the infobox, which is colorful but seems to have grown to dwarf the article. It seems WP:What Wikipedia is not might be considered. -- Otr500 ( talk) 21:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
@ Epicgenius: I am pretty sure the platforms here on the IND are 660 feet-E trains did run here with 11-car trains briefly in the 1950s. As an aside, we should add info about the MTA's planned redevelopment of the storefront space on the mezzanine level announced at an MTA board meeting in the fall.
The biggest hole in the article is the construction/planning for the BMT station, and the changes made to fit in the Dual Contracts IRT station. Your work on this article has been exceptional. There is also more to add on the late 80s/early 90s proposed station renovation, among other things. Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 19:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)