This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because... (The timeline doesn't even begin until April 1 (tomorrow), so there is no way the article can even have content. Sure, I created this page a little early, but that is no reason to delete it. It will likely have content by tomorrow (or the day after, depending on what happens in the political sphere.)) --
Mgasparin (
talk)
00:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment - The article was created on 28 March and I moved it to draft as there was no content. The creator moved it back to mainspace within hours. A conversation followed on
User talk:Mgasparin#Timeline of the Donald Trump presidency (2020 Q2) moved to draftspace, in which
Mgasparin assured me content would added in two days. Assuming good faith I tagged the article "under review" so other editors would not nominate it for speedy deletion in the interim. That assumption of good faith was clearly misplaced as no content had been added. Attempts to discuss it further have just been met with sarcastic comments. Given that it still has no content, and when content will be added is, as pointed out above, dependent on politics, then the
WP:A3 criteria for speedy deletion is still valid. --
John B123 (
talk)
01:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Hi
Buster7, I think as far as
refs are concerned, I would accept any reference provided that someone could go to that reference and view the coronavirus cases as they were ON THAT DAY, and not as they are currently. The biggest problem I have found with these sites is that they often only give the number of cases currently, not as they were sometime in the past.
Mgasparin (
talk)
00:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Right, thats a problem. Let me reconsider and search for some continuous source that locks in the # for that day. ―
Buster7☎06:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because... (The timeline doesn't even begin until April 1 (tomorrow), so there is no way the article can even have content. Sure, I created this page a little early, but that is no reason to delete it. It will likely have content by tomorrow (or the day after, depending on what happens in the political sphere.)) --
Mgasparin (
talk)
00:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment - The article was created on 28 March and I moved it to draft as there was no content. The creator moved it back to mainspace within hours. A conversation followed on
User talk:Mgasparin#Timeline of the Donald Trump presidency (2020 Q2) moved to draftspace, in which
Mgasparin assured me content would added in two days. Assuming good faith I tagged the article "under review" so other editors would not nominate it for speedy deletion in the interim. That assumption of good faith was clearly misplaced as no content had been added. Attempts to discuss it further have just been met with sarcastic comments. Given that it still has no content, and when content will be added is, as pointed out above, dependent on politics, then the
WP:A3 criteria for speedy deletion is still valid. --
John B123 (
talk)
01:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Hi
Buster7, I think as far as
refs are concerned, I would accept any reference provided that someone could go to that reference and view the coronavirus cases as they were ON THAT DAY, and not as they are currently. The biggest problem I have found with these sites is that they often only give the number of cases currently, not as they were sometime in the past.
Mgasparin (
talk)
00:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Right, thats a problem. Let me reconsider and search for some continuous source that locks in the # for that day. ―
Buster7☎06:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)reply