This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. More information: /  This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. This article has been marked as needing an infobox. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Sociology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why can't they just get rid of it and admit the one child policy was a mistake to begin with? They're going to have a shrinking population problem with or without this policy. -- Saledomo ( talk) 13:36, 1 June 2021 (UTC) reply

The talk page is about improving the article itself and not about the subject it describes. NM 23:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC) reply

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Riven3388 ( article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Riven3388 ( talk) 13:38, 1 December 2022 (UTC) reply

The article needs clarification. Firstly, its speaks of the law in the past tense, but does not mention the national government repealing it. As to further confusion, it's mentioned that the policy was adopted by the State Council and later amended by the Standing Committee of the NPC, but then later mentions authorities in Sichuan Province simply scrapping it. How is this possible? Please provide explanations in the article. Criticalthinker ( talk) 09:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply

To your first comment, I clarified in the lede by adding what the amendment of law did: allowing three children per couple. For your second comment, Sichuan did issue its rule allowing unlimited registrations. I added a citation. It is unclear from these reports what authority the Sichuan provincial government has to go beyond what the national law promulgates. Thank you. Path2space ( talk) 21:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply