![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Has anyone ever felt they benefitted from reading this book? If so in what way? Thanks :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.50.233.253 ( talk • contribs)
++No. This book is sad and confused. An angry reactive diatribe - which is hardly representative of Taoist philosophy. Hoff attacks everyhting from rock music to feminism. Odd. Yankoz.
The Tao of Pooh is a work of non-fiction, and by no means a novel as it is described in this article. John1701 ( talk) 22:27, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
"most Chinese stories are rather inaccessible to Westerners." Can anybody actually qualify this? John1701 ( talk) 22:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Has anyone ever felt they benefitted from reading this book? If so in what way? Thanks :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.50.233.253 ( talk • contribs)
++No. This book is sad and confused. An angry reactive diatribe - which is hardly representative of Taoist philosophy. Hoff attacks everyhting from rock music to feminism. Odd. Yankoz.
The Tao of Pooh is a work of non-fiction, and by no means a novel as it is described in this article. John1701 ( talk) 22:27, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
"most Chinese stories are rather inaccessible to Westerners." Can anybody actually qualify this? John1701 ( talk) 22:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)