![]() | The Sweet Hereafter (film) has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 15, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Even though the book, from what I understand (didn't read it), depicts their relationship as abusive it isn't so in the film. You can see them in one scene laying on a haystack, smiling to each other and french kissing. This doesn't seem abusive to me. The film suggests that she was acting out of spite when she lied in her deposition. The night before that she tells him she's no longer his beautiful rockstar girl. Seems like she had a crush on her dad, which the accident dispelled by making her disabled and now she can't live up to her father expectations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.226.52.125 ( talk) 22:33, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Popcornduff ( talk · contribs) 12:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
This is one of my favourite films. Looking forward to reviewing this article. Popcornduff ( talk) 12:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
First impressions: this looks like a nice, concise, well-cited article.
The prose is generally good, but I have some suggestions for clarifying and simplifying some parts:
This looks a little short to me. (I have a funny feeling I wrote it - or a version of it - a long time ago, whoops.) Having said that, I err on the side of brevity, and it's a deliberately concise movie, so if you don't think there's anything worth expanding on, that's totally cool. Clearly I didn't seem to think so at the time. Just double-check.
You don't need cast names in plot summaries when you have a cast section - unnecessary duplication.
Comment disagree running through the barrier isn't important, since the lawsuit (may) have been against the town for the rail. Ribbet32 ( talk) 06:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
A very nice article! A couple of comments:
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
OK, this looks like a Good Article to me. Congratulations and thanks for your hard work! Popcornduff ( talk) 04:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() | The Sweet Hereafter (film) has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 15, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Even though the book, from what I understand (didn't read it), depicts their relationship as abusive it isn't so in the film. You can see them in one scene laying on a haystack, smiling to each other and french kissing. This doesn't seem abusive to me. The film suggests that she was acting out of spite when she lied in her deposition. The night before that she tells him she's no longer his beautiful rockstar girl. Seems like she had a crush on her dad, which the accident dispelled by making her disabled and now she can't live up to her father expectations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.226.52.125 ( talk) 22:33, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Popcornduff ( talk · contribs) 12:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
This is one of my favourite films. Looking forward to reviewing this article. Popcornduff ( talk) 12:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
First impressions: this looks like a nice, concise, well-cited article.
The prose is generally good, but I have some suggestions for clarifying and simplifying some parts:
This looks a little short to me. (I have a funny feeling I wrote it - or a version of it - a long time ago, whoops.) Having said that, I err on the side of brevity, and it's a deliberately concise movie, so if you don't think there's anything worth expanding on, that's totally cool. Clearly I didn't seem to think so at the time. Just double-check.
You don't need cast names in plot summaries when you have a cast section - unnecessary duplication.
Comment disagree running through the barrier isn't important, since the lawsuit (may) have been against the town for the rail. Ribbet32 ( talk) 06:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
A very nice article! A couple of comments:
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
OK, this looks like a Good Article to me. Congratulations and thanks for your hard work! Popcornduff ( talk) 04:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)