The Ruins of Gorlan received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Its an awesome book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.17.68.26 ( talk) 01:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Now, I haven't heard anything about this new movie, and while that doesn't mean it isn't happening, the way the "movie rumor" section of the article just sounds to me like someone who started the rumor, and is trying to cover it up. I have therefore removed it from the article. Gherking 02:42, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
There is a movie, as you will find out in the article. DarkJak495 : Chat 12:53, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Image:Rangers Apprentice.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
I agree with Wikipedia. The plot is to long. It gives away most of the story, but I guess that is ok. But there is to many minor things that are in the Plot, and they shouldn't be there. I think that it should be edited, to make it shorter, and more to the major events. What do you think? DarkJak495 ( talk) 16:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
If you mean me, then yes, I would love to collabrate with you. Oh, and who or what is GA? DarkJak495 ( talk) 20:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Its okay about the acroynms. I am a new person at Wikipedia, and I am learning. I added the stuff about the movie and the awards. How is that? DarkJak495 : Chat 21:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Awesome job guys! It looks terrific.
PrincessofLlyr
royal court
14:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Sadads, would you please give this article a read over, and also consider the bellow. Thank you, UserDarkJak495 talk orange 17:21, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
There are still many ways to make this article better. If you are looking for something to do, you should look at the list below and see if you can do one of the things.
If you have any suggestions on something else that needs to be done, please feel free to add it to the list. Happy editing! UserDarkJak495 talk orange 13:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
As it is I think this article has too many sections. You could merge the "Awards" section with "Critical reception", and merge "Audiobook adaptation" with the rather paltry (at the moment!) "Movie" section. Even if this article greatly expands, I would still opt for using subsections, rather than allowing each topic to have its own full section. Oh and PS: I copy edited the whole thing, as per the request made of the Guild of Copy Editors... Let me know if you have any major qualms and happy editing! Bobnorwal ( talk) 20:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Could the North American cover be added, along with the Australian one? -- Billybob2002 ( talk) 21:12, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
As of 2022 a film or television show is highly unlikely 155.93.128.207 ( talk) 08:14, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
The Ruins of Gorlan received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Its an awesome book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.17.68.26 ( talk) 01:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Now, I haven't heard anything about this new movie, and while that doesn't mean it isn't happening, the way the "movie rumor" section of the article just sounds to me like someone who started the rumor, and is trying to cover it up. I have therefore removed it from the article. Gherking 02:42, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
There is a movie, as you will find out in the article. DarkJak495 : Chat 12:53, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Image:Rangers Apprentice.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
I agree with Wikipedia. The plot is to long. It gives away most of the story, but I guess that is ok. But there is to many minor things that are in the Plot, and they shouldn't be there. I think that it should be edited, to make it shorter, and more to the major events. What do you think? DarkJak495 ( talk) 16:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
If you mean me, then yes, I would love to collabrate with you. Oh, and who or what is GA? DarkJak495 ( talk) 20:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Its okay about the acroynms. I am a new person at Wikipedia, and I am learning. I added the stuff about the movie and the awards. How is that? DarkJak495 : Chat 21:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Awesome job guys! It looks terrific.
PrincessofLlyr
royal court
14:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Sadads, would you please give this article a read over, and also consider the bellow. Thank you, UserDarkJak495 talk orange 17:21, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
There are still many ways to make this article better. If you are looking for something to do, you should look at the list below and see if you can do one of the things.
If you have any suggestions on something else that needs to be done, please feel free to add it to the list. Happy editing! UserDarkJak495 talk orange 13:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
As it is I think this article has too many sections. You could merge the "Awards" section with "Critical reception", and merge "Audiobook adaptation" with the rather paltry (at the moment!) "Movie" section. Even if this article greatly expands, I would still opt for using subsections, rather than allowing each topic to have its own full section. Oh and PS: I copy edited the whole thing, as per the request made of the Guild of Copy Editors... Let me know if you have any major qualms and happy editing! Bobnorwal ( talk) 20:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Could the North American cover be added, along with the Australian one? -- Billybob2002 ( talk) 21:12, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
As of 2022 a film or television show is highly unlikely 155.93.128.207 ( talk) 08:14, 15 July 2022 (UTC)