This article is written in
American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
RoySmith (
talk) 21:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: Apologies for the amount of hooks. I am not the best at finding something "hooky" and will be more than happy to take any suggestions if there are better options.
Improved to Good Article status by
Aoba47 (
talk). Self-nominated at 08:42, 7 September 2022 (UTC).reply
ALT4: ... that the first and only season of The Random Years was the lowest-rated original program on network television that season?
ALT5: ... that The Random Years was panned as suffering from "a serious case of sitcomitis"?
Thank you for the edits to the article. Apologies for those very silly mistakes. Those two hooks look good. Thank you for the suggestions as those are always appreciated. As I said in my note, I am not the best at all about finding a good hook.
Aoba47 (
talk) 02:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Article recently taken to GA by the nominator. All the hooks (including the additions by theleekycauldron) are cited properly and interesting enough. No sign of copyvio. QPQ done. This should be good to go IMO.
FrB.TG (
talk) 17:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Thank you for reviewing this. I would more than happy with any of the proposed hooks being used. I do not have a strong preference either way.
Aoba47 (
talk) 17:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC)reply
This article is written in
American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
RoySmith (
talk) 21:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: Apologies for the amount of hooks. I am not the best at finding something "hooky" and will be more than happy to take any suggestions if there are better options.
Improved to Good Article status by
Aoba47 (
talk). Self-nominated at 08:42, 7 September 2022 (UTC).reply
ALT4: ... that the first and only season of The Random Years was the lowest-rated original program on network television that season?
ALT5: ... that The Random Years was panned as suffering from "a serious case of sitcomitis"?
Thank you for the edits to the article. Apologies for those very silly mistakes. Those two hooks look good. Thank you for the suggestions as those are always appreciated. As I said in my note, I am not the best at all about finding a good hook.
Aoba47 (
talk) 02:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Article recently taken to GA by the nominator. All the hooks (including the additions by theleekycauldron) are cited properly and interesting enough. No sign of copyvio. QPQ done. This should be good to go IMO.
FrB.TG (
talk) 17:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Thank you for reviewing this. I would more than happy with any of the proposed hooks being used. I do not have a strong preference either way.
Aoba47 (
talk) 17:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC)reply