This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the American cinema task force. United States: Arizona Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Here are some reviews of the film, to help flesh out the article. I'll do some of the work, too; kid is in school, so free time, while spotty, is available:

1. AllMovie [1]
2. Rotten Tomatoes [2]
3. Hollywood Reporter [3]
4. USA Today [4]
5. IMDb [5]
6. Fast Company [6] - source re: viral marketing campaign
7. Bloody-Disgusting [7]
8. Phoenix New Times [8]
9. Starburst Magazine [9]
10. Houston Film Fanatics [10]
11. iDigitalTimes [11]

I had set up the article with pretty much most of the necessary sections and subsections, leaving them available for unveiling as information can be added to them. I just ran out of steam. - Jack Sebastian ( talk) 04:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC) reply